Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
JESUS! My thread got closed! Is this question even to advanced for the moderators????? JESUS! My thread got closed! Is this question even to advanced for the moderators?????

03-16-2014 , 08:58 AM
My thread called ...Stay at 1/2 move to 2/5? But listen why.......was closed. This is not a typical variance question. I UNDERSTAND VARIANCE! Its like the moderatos even have tunnel vision! Please read other thread to understand my question. I play small stakes for a living...am a winning player online and live. I have final tables 3 WSOPC tourneys . Piss off. Everyone else , thanks for the input. But this IS AN ADVANCED question. On a bell curve...for those of us who play for a living (not de4df1sh), not all of our AA are going to be 80%+. Some will be barley be 63%..mine is running 95% (to high). That is the concept of a bell curve. NOW, THAT BEING SAID..When you have 6 people to a flop/turn that is PURE GAMBLING. Even if you had AA EVERYTIME you would loose money over time. You are an underdog. THATS A FACT... RUN IT IN POKERSTOVE. Now is it better to play this lottery, or play under rolled at 2/5..WHERE I HAVE WON REGULARLY , I'm just not rolled for it. Please, no more wanna bes or smart asses that play online but still have jobs. Thats why some people hate on this forum is for crap like that (eve the moderators are in question). I am looking for the input of an advanced player. Thanks everyone else, and I will embrace the variance.
03-16-2014 , 09:06 AM
You might understand variance but you don't understand EV. Learn math.
03-16-2014 , 09:10 AM
OP: Venice and the other mods on this forum have years of years experience with livepoker, and have lots of good reflections and knowledge to offer you. If you want to take it.

If you dont want to listen, thats your problem. Spamming down the forum when your thread got closed is not a good idea.
03-16-2014 , 09:11 AM
I agree it isn't a good idea.
Closed Thread Subscribe
...

      
m