Quote:
Originally Posted by cadillacgreels
To be clear, I started the hand with $500
In accepting this Reading Fail of the Day award, I'd like to thank the Academy, my family....
With $500 back calling the initial $15 for 3% of our stack is clear.
I think calling the 3b is a bit less so. Now we're putting in 7% of our stack. To some extent this is compensated because there's $165 in the pot already and there are three people. If we call, there's going to be $215 in the pot with $450 behind, which isn't great for stealing, but makes a stackoff trivial if we hit big. Using just our 2P+ equity, we'd need to average $630 = $35 * [1/5.28%-1] when we bink to make it breakeven. $165 + $450 puts us at $615, so we'd need more than one person putting money in the pot. And that's an average win, assuming we win every time we hit 2P+, which isn't going to happen. I'm pretty certain just our 2P+ equity isn't enough.
Stealing is going to be a bit tricky against a PF3b with SPR 2, so not much joy there.
We can flop some very nice draws, though that's not the same as winning the pot. My guess is that our draw EV + our 2P+ EV is enough to justify a call, but I don't think it's necessarily a huge opportunity.
To give some idea why I think this, if we won every single time we flopped either 2P+ or a combo draw, and stacked one person every time that happened, we'd win $615 about 90% of the time and lose $35 about 90% of the time. That's an EV of about $58, which ain't bad. But it's also entirely unrealistic. We're not going to win every time we hit; we're not going to stack someone every time we win. Our actual EV is significantly less than that $58. But I agree, it's still positive.
In conclusion:
I can't read.
Calling $15 is clearly right.
I think calling the $35 is right.