Quote:
Originally Posted by KingThor
If nit fish had a better hand then A9 he would have raised.
Then clearly you don't know what "nit" means.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingThor
It was $15 to play with a fish in position with my Qh6h and we were $500 effective. You wouldn't risk $15 for a chance to win$500?
Only if I can outplay my opponent(s) post flop without having the need to hit my cards, because Q6s has very little absolute value.
It is quite apparent that you don't have that ability post flop:
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingThor
He raised UTG to $20, fish called in the BB and I called cuz I wanted to play with the fish with Qh6h. Flop came Ah4s3h. He bet $40, fish called I called. Turn is a Kh.
Sb checks I check V#2 makes it $100, fish calls, I jam with the nuts.
Both players call.
Plus your HH is incorrect. V2 raised $20 UTG and V1 is in BB, so you must have either been in SB or IP.
So flop action is wrong, and turn action is wrong.
Either way, it is quite clear that you played the hand for absolute value and you were hoping to "hit" to beat your "nit fish" opponent.
Incorrect thought process all around.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingThor
I put myself in the exact situation I wanted with the nuts on the turn and 2 players with sets blocking each other and drawing to 20%. If the flop comes queen high with action it's an easy fold.
So let me understand you better. If you flop TP, you're folding, but if you flop a draw, you're calling?
Have you ever ran any sort of equity calculator?
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingThor
And the a9 hand took place about 3 hours after the q6 hand and the KK hand. I won the KK and an orbit later lost the q6. 3 hours later the a9 Han occurs.
And I'm always flatting KK to an opponent I read as super strong.
Above is just some sort of result oriented thinking to justify your biased thought process that is incorrect.