Quote:
Originally Posted by bulls_horn
Grunching a bit, as I didn't wade through all the maths, as I feel mistakes were made earlier which got us to our current quandry.
First, you should raise pre here 100% of the time. I probably make it 20-25, enough to fold out a limper or two (Hooray for dead money). There are a few reasons:
* Number 1 is Don't EVER over-limp LP. Over-limping is a passive, weak-tight play that'll just dwindle your stack. Either raise or fold.
*Second, you straddled. This is why you straddled, is it not? To bloat it make it prohibitive for speculative hands and scary for weak made hands and take it down through unbridled aggression? It's what I always thought the straddle was about. Maybe there's a good COTM on straddling and why we do it, but I've never thought over-limping and set-mining were among the reasons. I've always thought that if you straddled and it limps around, raising would be almost automatic with all but the trashiest of hands. If you don't have the sand to raise a decent holding here, why straddle at all? (I won't even get into the reasons it's Ev- to even straddle in the first place, that's another thread entirely.)
* Third reason to raise is because we have a pocket pair. This is probably the best hand currently at the table, so punish the limpers for playing bad. Also, if we do hit our set, we do want that pot to be bloated a bit.
You should raise this flop for sure. Maybe even an over-raise to make up for value lost by limping pre. Also, with three to a suit, we're almost always against a flush draw, so we need to make opponents make the mistake.
I'm going to disagree here, for a few reasons.
#1 this is $1/$3. at most $1/$3 tables you can bloat up the pot at any street, and definitely overbet the pot on the flop or turn and get called by a range wider than you are probably expecting. so that alone takes away one big reason for raising pre(being able to build a pot you can make larger on later streets) because you can make the pot as big as you want on later streets anyway.
#2 small pocket pairs are hands that don't flop particularly well against hands that are going to be calling $25 raises at this table (probably). remember, villain in BB is assumed to be holding the nut flush on the turn and he is betting only $35 into what probably looks like a $70 pot. what is he going to need to call $25? rolled up kings?
#3 you run the risk of being limp-repopped on a table with maniacs who are shoving J6s pre-flop and thats like the absolute worst thing that can happen to you with pocket 5s. someone who is shoving j6s pre is probably someone who can pick up that you're just trying to scoop a small pot from the straddle with a position raise like that and there is low chance they'll show respect for it if "come over the top with j6s" is part of their pre-flop game.
just imagine what happens if that scenario occurs. you have a hand that flops to the nuts and you have the dealer button and instead of getting to see a flop now you're getting limp-reraised by a villain who starts his shoving range at exactly the point against which you start flipping against him? any time you're getting limp-3bet here you're never going to be ahead and you probably don't have fold equity either.
#4 lets say someone calls $25 and this flop comes out. now what do you do? go all in when big blind leads out for $50? your hand doesn't even look that good now against hands that will be calling you and then leading out on the flop.
pot control and getting a cheap price on the turn to make a hand you can win an entire stack with is a good way to play this hand.