You won't listen to any pf talk because you did the right thing...

... you left out information to prevent us from discussing the pf/flop/turn action...

... so you're putting in a hand you made a "sick call" with to prove to us you do win hands because all of us obviously get together on the weekends to make fun of you for never taking a pot...

It's actually the definition of BBV.

Ok...? His hand looks more like a pair+FD, frankly. But I was just saying that 88 is within the realm of his range, as played, since he's a weirdo 1/2 player. PF and flop definitely fit. Turn fits, given your read that he seemed to want to put in a 3bet, but didnt. River skews it away somewhat.

But whatever, not really worth discussing. I admit, you were there and had a feel for how the guy played. With that extra info, I'm fine with saying you're right.

nh, gg, gl.

EDIT: I didnt notice the nonsense that ensued after the post I quoted, nor did I see results. Had I seen all of that, I wouldnt have taken the time to post again in your thread. Oh well. Hope for the sake of you and others at the table, the guy reloaded. He's obviously a maniac.

misread stack sizes. apologies

+1

i was wondering whether my ego, which obv was happy i made a "sick call", was completely wrong and it was a clear fold.

radioheadfan's analysis was bang on and i appreciate it a lot.

i left out info because i didn't want to give my opinion because that seems to influence the responses and i would like to know what the correct decision is in a certain spot if there are not any tells.

and sorry blasted7, sheesh can't say GTFO on an internet forum in 2014! haha. i just think a fishy player hardly ever flats a set on a blank turn to strong aggression

like i said... first thing i thought after the hand is i'm posting that to see if that was just me making a "sick call" (which was last thing running through my mind when i called).

calls, i don't think he has many flushes bar Acx

did u have any history btw?