Quote:
Originally Posted by str8buster
Villain leads out $20. I make it $60. Other two fold. Villain reraises to $145.
Here's the communication that took place in this hand. Villain says: I hit that flop and I want to build a pot.
We responded great and raised. Then Villain said: I want to play for stacks.
According to people posting here: p.s. I have a weak hand was part of that message.
Seriously folks?
When we raised the flop we told him that his sets and low flushes were no good.
And when we responded to us by 3-betting the flop his message to us wasn't that our hand was good.
A question: What more could the Villain possibly do to convince you that he had the nuts?
On the turn we have a bluff-catcher for someone who is never bluffing.
It is a very good second best hand and looks very pretty.
Tight people don't call raises with QJs. Even if they did there's one combo we're ahead of.
This is an extremely easy fold to make and if we're going to be opening Kx suited it's once that we should be prepared to make.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian O'Nolan
If villain is calling a raise with Axs pre he's calling a raise with QJs. We don't have any info about how loose he is (though we should after playing 4 hrs with him). We should certainly expect an unknown 2/5 player to call most of the time from the BB w QJs after a 3x raise and 2 callers, and we shouldn't be surprised to see him call smaller SCs (although there aren't too many combos of those on this board).
When the Villain 3-bets the flop do you think there's any information in that bet? Is he communicating anything about his hand strength to you? Is it to early to narrow his hand range at all??
Last edited by au4all; 01-19-2015 at 08:00 AM.