Quote:
Originally Posted by gobbledygeek
People are making out OP's 3bet size as horrible; it ain't. He's offering really poor 10:1 IO with his sizing versus the raiser. I'm slightly more conservative and like offering even poorer 8:1 IO, but it hardly makes a huge difference.
Offering 8:1 would be a 3bet to $41. The difference between TT/88 calling a $35 raise versus a $41 is virtually nil. On top of that, the point of the 3bet sizing isn't to raise these hands out preflop: it's to give them an unprofitable call (even when our plan is to stack off 100% of the time postflop, which it should be). Villain's call with TT/88 is definitely unprofitable to OPs 3bet sizing; it would be slightly more unprofitable with a slightly larger raise.
GimoG
Hero has AA here but our whole 3B range from the BB includes KQs+ for value, and A4s/A5s/77 as bluffs and we are betting them all to the same size.
Thinking about it, 4x-4.5x +limpers + Blind in a splashy game is fine IMO.
My aim is to go HU or take down the pot pre and to be tough to play against every time I 3B - not only when I have AA
With 2 limpers and a raiser in the pot and being OOP on every street post, I want all of my 3B's to be on the larger size so they are easy to play post.
No need to change what you are doing GG because you know what you are doing and have been doing it for a long time - but for newer players especially, 3 betting to a larger size will give them more confidence to play post flop streets better.
This hand should have gone down like this.
Limp, limp, raise, re-raise (raise GII) or call.
Bet 40%- 60% Flop. Raise. GII.
How it went down was lolbad from everyone and the given the OP thought it was worth posting indicates that he/she might be looking for better ways to play from the Hero's POV.