Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
Concur strongly with the fold pre comments, but let's take a closer look at post.
He bets 60 into 110. Given reads we can pretty much assume that he has AT+, TT, and maybe some combos of 55 here (but I think he folds that pre OOP most of the time?). You have 9 outs to the flush, so you will hit OTT about 18% of the time. Your call of 60 would represent 26% of the total pot of $230, so you are not getting the right expressed odds to call flop.
However, your reads tell you that he'll likely "same bet" the turn if you call. That means that you have the implied chance to see two cards for $120, which will be 34% of the pot of $350 That is just under your equity of 35% against his range (not 36% because a very few times you will flush and he will boat). This means you are paying less than your equity and getting the right expressed odds if you are sure that he will bet small or check OTT.
If you have any implied odds, (he will make and/or call a bet after you hit your flush), it gets better.
Cliffs: Pre is horrible, as shown above. You got very "lucky" to hit something you could continue with. Flop is iffy against most players and would really depend on IOs, how often they could have better FDs, etc. It's OK given reads, though. Turn is an obvious call, as you have expressed odds.
Really good posts from mpethybridge and you Garrick.
However, I think we cannot rely on villain to bet 60 on the flop and 60 ott. Op stated it's usually 2/3 on the flop but on this occasion it was 60 into 110. Then op said that he makes a same size bet ott usually, but I'm assuming sized in pot terms as in half to 2/3 of the pot rather than another 60.
Its a mistake to assume villain will only bet 1/4 pot on the turn as he did in this case. The vast majority of villains will bet at least half pot, denying us the correct expressed and odds. The only other way we could win this hand would be to make a substantial bet if he checks the turn because he doesn't have an A, therefore turning our hand into a bluff with some equity, but often times its unlikely he will fold.
However, in this case and as you played it, he's not letting go of TPGK very often unless you are seen as extremely nitty.
It all goes back to my original post advising a fold pre-flop and mpethybridge 's very good explanation as to why you should based on pure math.