Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > >

Notices

Live Low-stakes NL Discussion of up to 3/5 live no-limit, pot-limit and spread-limit Texas Hold'em poker games, situations and strategies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-20-2017, 11:43 AM   #26
Garick
Oberbiergenießer
 
Garick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Do you even math, bruh?
Posts: 17,118
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

No, it's not just "fun knowledge.". If you know the actual math behind it and work the accurate numbers away from the table, it improves your ability to quickly and more accurately estimate at the table.
Garick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2017, 10:39 PM   #27
TheStrumps
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 82
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

If you guys can come up with a simple method to calculate equity without using pokerstove that would be impressive. Calculating pot odds and converting our outs to percentage of success is simple and there is no need to complicate it. What is the point of doing all that 7×4(8÷3+2-4)((8×6)) 2 when it is as simple as the rule of four and two ?
The influence of some training sites that are trying hard to impress with their math wizzards is obvious on threads like this.

Last edited by TheStrumps; 12-20-2017 at 10:52 PM.
TheStrumps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2017, 10:46 PM   #28
TheStrumps
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 82
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZuneIt View Post
You're right!
Quads = ((2/50)*(1/49)*(48/48))*3 = 0.24%
Full House = ((2/50)*(48/49)*(3/48))*3 = .73%
Set = ((2/50)*(48/49)*(44/48))*3 = 10.78%

(100-11.75)/11.75 = 7.51:1
Take a look at this for example.. all we need to know here is

- Quads = 0.24%
- Full House = 0.73%
- Set = 10.78%

The rest is chinese and you do not need it.
TheStrumps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2017, 10:54 PM   #29
Garick
Oberbiergenießer
 
Garick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Do you even math, bruh?
Posts: 17,118
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheStrumps View Post
If you guys can come up with a simple method to calculate equity without using pokerstove that would be impressive. Calculating pot odds and converting our outs to percentage of success is simple and there is no need to complicate it. What is the point of doing all that 7×4(8÷3+2-4)((8×6)) 2 when it is as simple as the rule of four and two ?
The influence of some training sites is obvious on threads like this.
Because the rule of 2 and 4 is just an estimate, and it is worth knowing what is behind that estimate and how far off it can be.

Also because without understanding the underlying math, I could just through some BS rule-of-thumb that I completely made up like "If you have 2 overs you always have at least 12.5% equity" and you wouldn't be able to tell that it was baloney.
Garick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2017, 11:09 PM   #30
TheStrumps
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 82
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick View Post
Because the rule of 2 and 4 is just an estimate, and it is worth knowing what is behind that estimate and how far off it can be.

Also because without understanding the underlying math, I could just through some BS rule-of-thumb that I completely made up like "If you have 2 overs you always have at least 12.5% equity" and you wouldn't be able to tell that it was baloney.

The rule of four and two is an accurate estimate very slightly off. Ofcourse it is worth knowing what is behind that estimate but not essential. Knowing the maths behind why you hitting a set 11% of the time will not make you a better poker player. Nor are you a better poker player if you know that actually flopping a set is 10.78% chance and not 11%.

It is worth knowing all the math behind these numbers but as I said for fun.
TheStrumps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2017, 11:19 PM   #31
Garick
Oberbiergenießer
 
Garick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Do you even math, bruh?
Posts: 17,118
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Quote:
The rule of four and two is an accurate estimate very slightly off.
You are incorrect, sir. Depending on the number of outs, it can be significantly off, as small rounding errors add up.

In the meantime, if you don't see value in this thread, you are welcome not to participate. Laughing at others for actually studying what is actually going on behind the estimates they see thrown around is not welcome.
Garick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2017, 11:51 PM   #32
TheStrumps
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 82
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick View Post
You are incorrect, sir. Depending on the number of outs, it can be significantly off, as small rounding errors add up.

In the meantime, if you don't see value in this thread, you are welcome not to participate. Laughing at others for actually studying what is actually going on behind the estimates they see thrown around is not welcome.

Rule of 2 accuracy
Outs 4 and 2 Actual Difference
4 (gutshot) 8% 8.7% -0.7%
8 (straight) 16% 17.4% -1.4%
9 (flush) 18% 19.6% -1.6%
15 (straight + flush) 30% 32.6% -2.6%

Rule of 4 accuracy
Outs 4 and 2 Actual Difference
4 (gutshot) 16% 16.5% -0.5%
8 (straight) 32% 31.5% +0.5%
9 (flush) 36% 35% +1%
15 (straight + flush) 60% 54.1% +5.9%

I do not see where it goes significantly off and I was not laughing at noone. Im sorry if I got out of line somehow.

Last edited by TheStrumps; 12-21-2017 at 12:00 AM.
TheStrumps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2017, 12:46 AM   #33
TheStrumps
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 82
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Valuable information is the content of the thread quoted by Venice. Staff like that easy to read and valuable for your game I can read all day. Anyway good luck with your maths guys, take it easy
TheStrumps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2017, 04:43 AM   #34
Garick
Oberbiergenießer
 
Garick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Do you even math, bruh?
Posts: 17,118
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

You really don't think a difference of 5.9% (out of 54.1, so overestimating EV by more than 10% of it's actual value) is significant? Good luck on the tables.
Garick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2017, 07:31 AM   #35
TheStrumps
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 82
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick View Post
You really don't think a difference of 5.9% (out of 54.1, so overestimating EV by more than 10% of it's actual value) is significant? Good luck on the tables.
You are wrong. You should have figured it out as a math enthusiast that when you've got a +50% chance of winning the pot, calling is EV+ regardless of the size of the bet.
TheStrumps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2017, 07:58 AM   #36
ZuneIt
veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Where I can find out how2play poker
Posts: 2,096
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

@TheStrumps: I disagree with your strong devaluation of the math. When I first started playing Hold 'Em, no-limit wasn't played at the casinos. When I stumbled upon Petrov's book on the odds, I knew it was an auto-raise otf vs. 5 Vs when I was last to act with a flush draw. When NL became the craze, knowing that you're 1.86:1 dog to make a flush by the river if you go all in otf & 2.18:1 to make a str8, was extremely valuable.

It was studying the math that allowed me to fully understand just how weak/vulnerable QTs was vs an EP o/r. I'm not from Missouri, but I'm a "show me" kinda' guy & that's what the math does. I don't have all the above memorized, but if a rookie understood that the odds of flopping 2 pair was 48.x:1, the rookie would still be able to fold [hopefully] even after spending an hour at the table watching several different people flop 2 pair.

Folding is boring for rookies & when they don't know the math & see people pullin' off these great catches & scooping pots with hands they would have folded, they begin to think they're doing it all wrong.

"Would you look at that! That guy just called a 6x bet OTB with J8o, flopped 2 pair for the best hand & then got runner-runner str8 to rub salt in the wound of his V's pocket kings! Now that's fun Hold 'Em!"

P.S. How much do you think math helps a NASCAR driver understand the limitations of his vehicle? Do you think he drives strictly by the seat of his pants?
ZuneIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2017, 11:20 AM   #37
Garick
Oberbiergenießer
 
Garick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Do you even math, bruh?
Posts: 17,118
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheStrumps View Post
You are wrong. You should have figured it out as a math enthusiast that when you've got a +50% chance of winning the pot, calling is EV+ regardless of the size of the bet.
And if calling bets were the only thing we had to determine, that rule of thumb would be all we had to know...

Again, if you don't think that actual math matters, you are welcome not to participate in the thread.

And for what it's worth, I'm not much of a math enthusiast. I hate math. I'm not very good at it and have to force myself to do it. Doing so has immeasurably improved my game, though.
Garick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2017, 11:44 AM   #38
TheStrumps
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 82
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick View Post
And if calling bets were the only thing we had to determine, that rule of thumb would be all we had to know...

Again, if you don't think that actual math matters, you are welcome not to participate in the thread.

And for what it's worth, I'm not much of a math enthusiast. I hate math. I'm not very good at it and have to force myself to do it. Doing so has immeasurably improved my game, though.
Im sorry I meant to say any bet you make or call with +50% of winning the pot is EV+.

Again I think that math is important but not these numbers of the OP. I would not participate in the thread if you would not quote me again. I force myself too and maths have helped my game too so its cool.
TheStrumps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2017, 12:04 PM   #39
TheStrumps
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 82
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZuneIt View Post
P.S. How much do you think math helps a NASCAR driver understand the limitations of his vehicle? Do you think he drives strictly by the seat of his pants?
I would bet that out of 10 NASCAR drivers 5 would not be able to calculate 3 divided by 5.
TheStrumps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2017, 12:39 PM   #40
gobbledygeek
Poet Laureate of LLSNL
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 26,871
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Since all we can do is estimate our outs anyways (i.e. we never really know exactly how many outs we have), then being off a bit with the rule of 2 and 4 isn't that big of a deal. Hopefully the rule will show us the times we have a clear call vs fold, but in the grey area times a lot more importance is probably on how accurate our outs / range estimating is.

Obviously the original math was required in order for someone to come up with the rule. But it isn't required knowledge necessary to succeed at the poker table.

Gnothatingatall,justsayin'G
gobbledygeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2017, 03:53 PM   #41
Garick
Oberbiergenießer
 
Garick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Do you even math, bruh?
Posts: 17,118
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Quote:
in the grey area times a lot more importance is probably on how accurate our outs / range estimating is.
Very much agreed, as Garbage In = Garbage Out. Hand reading is a separate topic though. We could definitely use a COTM on it, if anyone wants to volunteer. In the mean time, the fact that it's important doesn't mean that being familiar with the underlying math that affects the correct response to said ranges is not itself also valuable.
Garick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2017, 07:25 PM   #42
venice10
Referee
 
venice10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nowhere special
Posts: 22,508
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheStrumps View Post
I would bet that out of 10 NASCAR drivers 5 would not be able to calculate 3 divided by 5.
I'm confident that NASCAR drivers have someone on their team that can do this math and does the more complicated calculations. At the poker table, we don't have someone to tell us what the calculations are.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheStrumps View Post
If you guys can come up with a simple method to calculate equity without using pokerstove that would be impressive.
A difference between LLSNL players and mid-stakes pro is what they define as study. LLSNL players generally mean they are watching a video (if they are younger) or reading a book (if older). Mid-stakes pros are running Equilab or something else looking at equity results to learn something their opponents don't know.
venice10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2017, 04:58 PM   #43
browni3141
veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,051
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheStrumps View Post
Poker is not Algebra.
Right, there's a lot of calculus and statistics, too.

You have memorized the things other people tell you are important. Knowledge of math allows me to discover myself what is important, which is much more helpful.
browni3141 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2017, 09:06 PM   #44
CallMeVernon
COTM Crusher
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Not Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,085
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Quote:
Originally Posted by browni3141 View Post
there's a lot of calculus
By all means, feel free to enlighten us as to what part of the math of poker requires calculus.
CallMeVernon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2017, 10:28 PM   #45
Nutland
newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 42
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Thanks for the effort Vernon.
Nutland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2017, 03:26 PM   #46
browni3141
veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,051
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Quote:
Originally Posted by CallMeVernon View Post
By all means, feel free to enlighten us as to what part of the math of poker requires calculus.
Off the top of my head, a lot of bet sizing optimization problems and the derivation of bankroll formulas.
browni3141 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2018, 08:24 PM   #47
ZuneIt
veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Where I can find out how2play poker
Posts: 2,096
Re: COTM: Basic Poker Math

Maybe we could have a Part II: Math to know post-flop.

Such as: You have 77 on a flop of 622

You bet & it folds to your aggro LAG who shoves. You deduce that he wouldn't shove with an over-pair here, because he doesn't have a big PP because he didn't 3! pre. So, you put him on two A2s, that he may shove with trying to get you to think he's weak [with a FD] & a flush draw with two overs, or a FD with A3s-A5s.

There are 2 A2s & 3 AXs that he would do it with: A9s & A8s & A7s & A5s. He is aggro enough to 3! pre with AJs+.

You have ~9% equity vs. the two A2s & ~54% equity vs. the four FDs, or 2:1

So, [9+54+54]/3 = 59% equity vs. his range.

If we're only putting in something like 35% of the money, if we call, we have a substantial overlay that can compensate for a reduced number of of FDs he may hold.

For instance, if he only has 2 FDs, it would 1:1 & [9+54]/2 = 32%, so we would need him having 2 FDs in the [A3s-A5s range] where he only has 1 overcard for [9+59+59]/3 = 42% equity.

So what we need to have memorized:
1. An overpair vs trips has 9% equity.
2. An overpair vs a flush draw with 2 overs has 51% equity.
2. An overpair vs a flush draw, 1 over & runner/runner str8 [under our PP] has 59% equity.
ZuneIt is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2008-2017, Two Plus Two Interactive
 
 
Poker Players - Streaming Live Online