Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > >

Notices

Live Low-stakes NL Discussion of up to 3/5 live no-limit, pot-limit and spread-limit Texas Hold'em poker games, situations and strategies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2017, 08:16 AM   #26
cicakman
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
cicakman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 9,151
Re: Combating the rake $1-2 / $1-3 as a rec player

Quote:
Originally Posted by flopturntree View Post
Stop thinking about the rake, it isn't going to do you any favors in the long run. Just adjust your play according to the table and try to win the most money as you can.

But yes if you are really worried about it just don't tip as much, over the weekend in my 2/5 game this guy tipped a green chip after winning a 500 dollar pot like really?

It's good that you are thinking about the hands you are calling with preflop and what range of hands you are opening but the rake should not be a big factor IF AT ALL in your decisions
This. More focus on strategy less on rake.
cicakman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2017, 07:25 PM   #27
javi
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,413
Re: Combating the rake $1-2 / $1-3 as a rec player

Another big problem with the lowest limit live is most people buy in for the minimum, so you're often playing vs $40 stacks eating $7 rake per hand. You dont really have to be a poker god to clean up though. Some of the worst players I've seen will cash out for 1k+ at a 2/2 game just because they got it in a bunch of times. Not even necessarily running hot, just getting paid off repeatedly by 50BB stacks and such. So it's more kinda like just hoping to be there at the right time.
javi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2017, 07:31 PM   #28
MikeStarr
Pooh-Bah
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,936
Re: Combating the rake $1-2 / $1-3 as a rec player

Quote:
Originally Posted by javi View Post
Another big problem with the lowest limit live is most people buy in for the minimum, so you're often playing vs $40 stacks eating $7 rake per hand. You dont really have to be a poker god to clean up though. Some of the worst players I've seen will cash out for 1k+ at a 2/2 game just because they got it in a bunch of times. Not even necessarily running hot, just getting paid off repeatedly by 50BB stacks and such. So it's more kinda like just hoping to be there at the right time.
I think the word "most" is a bit of an exaggeration. More than half the 1/2 players buy in for the minimum? Not where I play.

During the day time I would say there will be 2-3 min buy ins at a 10 handed table ($60 where I play).

During the evening, there may still be 1-2 min buyins but there is also 3-4 max buy ins which is $300 in my room. The others will be $100-$200.
MikeStarr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2017, 01:49 AM   #29
javi
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,413
Re: Combating the rake $1-2 / $1-3 as a rec player

^ this is probably more accurate. My memory is likely biased from the rage I feel when someone sits down with their buyin hidden in the palm of their hand. I assume theres a chip runner getting the rest once they are dealt cards until I lean forward and see "ah, 8 red chips, sigh"
javi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:53 PM   #30
ZuneIt
old hand
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Where I can find out how2play poker
Posts: 1,609
Re: Combating the rake $1-2 / $1-3 as a rec player

Here is the problem with gobbledygeek's example:
He bet $15 & got one caller. The BB. If he he had made it $18, V would have to call $15 more & pot would be $32 after the rake.

Now he can bet $22 & there will be $73 after the rake.

gobbledygeek robbed himself of $3.00, when he only bets $22 OTT. You must be conscious of the pot vs. rake early on, or it will eat you alive in the long run.

Another thing to think of: keep your stack at the max & DO NOT tip from your stack. If the max is $300, do not let it drop below $295. One all-in that you win, with $265 in front of you vs. a V that had $300+ is painful.

Say you've been playing for hours, won a number of pots, but lost one big one & have recovered & are now sitting on $450 and a player has you covered. You've tipped a total of $15 during the session.. You get it all in vs the guy who covers & win.........you win $15 LESS than you would have if you had not been tipping from your stack.

Now tips cost you $30 instead of $15.00 because you tipped from your stack. Or, if you're a math geek: You had 60% equity when you got it all in. $15 * .6 = $9.00 loss long term.

Last edited by ZuneIt; Yesterday at 01:07 PM.
ZuneIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 01:17 PM   #31
gobbledygeek
Poet Laureate of LLSNL
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 24,301
Re: Combating the rake $1-2 / $1-3 as a rec player

Zune: But doesn't that mostly apply to any bet sizing? i.e. betting $20 instead of $21 on any street "costs" me $1 if I woulda got called.

Interesting thoughts regarding not tipping from your stack though.

However, after thinking about it for a bit, overall I'm not convinced it makes that much difference. If you've seen my posts over the years, you'll note I'll start off most of them with "top up" (if you feel you are at a good table). But even M said a while back that it is unlikely it would have cost me hardly anything over the years having not done so, and I'm finally coming around to the fact that he might be right (especially in my game's current conditions). Basically, as long as you have the fish covered, then it's unlikely this tipping method will help you. I mean, after all, when was the last time you got in $450 versus anyone? It probably happens so infrequently that it has hardly any affect on the bottom line (and meanwhile the difficulties of playing deep might outweigh the advantages of playing short).

But if you do constantly find yourself stacking fish and you have less chips in your stack than theirs thanks to your tipping out of your stack, then agreed, this will have an affect.

GI'veneveractuallyseensomeonetipfromoutsidetheirst ackG
gobbledygeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 01:29 PM   #32
ZuneIt
old hand
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Where I can find out how2play poker
Posts: 1,609
Re: Combating the rake $1-2 / $1-3 as a rec player

I can't imagine someone folding for $22 that would have definitely called $20.
I've had people ask me "Why $18 instead of $15?" and I'll respond "Because that will make the pot a total of $59 and the house doesn't get to rake any of the $9 unless we bet/call the next street."

I believe it's better for the winning players, if everyone at the table is thinking that way, so I'm willing to share my line of thinking. When the players are trying to nickle/dime the house in games where pots often don't allow the house to get the max rake, the players are winning when they max it out to the nines! That dollar you save can be used to tip the dealer which you were going to do anyways.
ZuneIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 01:55 PM   #33
gobbledygeek
Poet Laureate of LLSNL
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 24,301
Re: Combating the rake $1-2 / $1-3 as a rec player

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZuneIt View Post
I can't imagine someone folding for $22 that would have definitely called $20.
Yeah, I agree with you to a point, but doesn't that apply to every single bet we make? I mean, if you end up betting $25, then why didn't you go $26?

GsplittingstrawsatthispointG
gobbledygeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 02:07 PM   #34
Highspirit1978
centurion
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 173
Re: Combating the rake $1-2 / $1-3 as a rec player

in casino niagara the rake is $6/.5 hour, which i find expensive. This is why I play tournies
Highspirit1978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 02:08 PM   #35
ZuneIt
old hand
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Where I can find out how2play poker
Posts: 1,609
Re: Combating the rake $1-2 / $1-3 as a rec player

Well, it depends on what's already in the pot. You want to get close to a 9.
Now pre, I'm always betting $12, $13, $17, $18 type numbers, when it looks like there's a good chance it will be HU.

If it's folded to you & you're OTB with a $12 hand, then it's worth $13. If only the SB calls, there's $28 in the pot b4 the rake. Perfect.

Now if you get a favorable flop, you can bet [if it's checked] accordingly to get close to a 9. If you bet 3/4 pot, that's $21, bringing total to $70, maxing out the rake. So why not bet at least $22 & preferably $23?

Of course, if you want a call & believe he is going to call $20, wouldn't he call $22? But if you're not sure he'll call $20, but want $20 or take what's there, well then you have to bet $21, which is not going to affect your V's decision. But if you think it might, $20 it is.

When you want a call, betting the right amount that will achieve that is #1. Taking into account the rake is #2.
ZuneIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 07:01 PM   #36
Garick
Oberbiergenießer
 
Garick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Do you even math, bruh?
Posts: 15,609
Re: Combating the rake $1-2 / $1-3 as a rec player

Quote:
Originally Posted by Highspirit1978 View Post
in casino niagara the rake is $6/.5 hour, which i find expensive. This is why I play tournies
Let's assume 10-handed table. This is $120/hr in rake. Seems like a lot, right?

Well, assuming 30 hands per hour, that's an average rake of $4/hand. Others ITT are reporting 10% to a max of $6. Obviously, not every hand maxes out, but IME > 2/3 of them do. That means 20x$6 ($120) plus whatever is raked in the 10 small pots. I'd guestimate that your time rake is ~ the same as a 10% to a max of $5, which is not cheap, but not outrageous by current standards.

Meanwhile, it is rare to find a daily tourney that rakes less than 20%. I don't think you are making the correct value decision.
Garick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 08:43 PM   #37
BackDoorFlush
old hand
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,646
Re: Combating the rake $1-2 / $1-3 as a rec player

Quote:
Originally Posted by Highspirit1978 View Post
in casino niagara the rake is $6/.5 hour, which i find expensive. This is why I play tournies
$12 per hour in time rake?!?

That's one of the lowest time rakes that you will find.
BackDoorFlush is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive
 
 
Poker Players - Streaming Live Online