Villain 1 looks like a recreational player. Asian, in his late 20s or early 30s. I don’t give him respect for being a good player because he bought into the game for 50bb ($200) as opposed to competent players who buy-in for the max to maximize their win rate and feel competent in their game. He just sat down within 3 minutes of this hand taking place.
Villain 2 is a Hispanic guy on a downward spiral calling off his stack and is playing every single hand. He is a calling station. Just a degenerate gambler.
Live $2/$4 Full Ring Cash Game at Oaks (200maximum bet or raise on top with $400 max buy-in and $5 drop)
Stacks:
Villain 1 is SB with $195
Villain 2 is UTG+1 with $120
Hero is MP with $350
Pre-Flop: ($6) Hero is MP with A
Q
UTG+1 limps for $4, Hero raises to $20, folds around to BTN who calls $20, SB calls $20, UTG+1 calls $16.
Flop: J
6
Q
($80, 4 players)
SB checks, UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $65, BTN folds, SB raises all-in for $175, UTG+1 goes all-in for $100, Hero?
Do you call getting 4:1 knowing that V2 is on tilt and calling off with his entire range and knowing you only have to be good 20% of the time against V1 to be profitable?
Or do you fold because you think that in live games, c/r are super strong and indicative of sets or two pair hands and you can’t overcall an all-in because V2 is all-in (despite his losing image and style)?
We do not have enough info on V1 to determine if he is overplaying top pair.
Thank you in advance.