Quote:
Originally Posted by cicakman
These threads are funny. Everyone wants to assume villain raises a stronger Tx, but also fold T9 to this raise as hero. It's like a results oriented oxymoron. Raising a T on the flop has to be terrible if everyone is saying snap fold T9.
are you suggesting that 1/3 players play well? why on earth is a 1/3 player not justified in folding like a nit to raises, but bluffing known nit-regs in spots like this? my priors on the likelihood of finding a thinking player in 1/3 are very, very, very low. are yours different?
by all means post what you think is a plausible range for villain that would justify further action. (I don't think it can't be done, but it hasn't been done in this thread)
Last edited by SameRiverTwice; 02-18-2017 at 02:20 AM.