Quote:
Originally Posted by Evsy
I can't really imagine flatting a 3 bet here multi way out of position, definitely seems like the losing play.
The fact that you can't imagine flatting a 3bet here when flatting a 3bet is
at least arguably profitable (and I would argue is indeed profitable) is a leak. There are also arguments for folding, even though I find them unconvincing. But at a bare minimum you should understand the argument for flatting. If you don't understand the case for flatting, you'll fold in other marginally better spots where folding is CLEARLY worse.
But the title of this thread and this post makes it sound like you just accept that flat-calling AK isn't even worth considering in spots like these. In small stakes NL, your 4 bets with AK will often narrow down ranges to those that crush you.
Truthfully it actually is fairly marginal, but folding marginally profitable hands isn't conducive to improving skills so we can move up.
This is very similar to another recent hand so I'll just link to my reasoning there:
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...1&postcount=18
You can confidently fold if you can eliminate a hand as good as QQ from the reraiser's range. Knowing that he's an "older gentleman," we should start by assuming he's tight, but not that tight.
(You can also reasonably fold if you can eliminate JJ and AK from his range and if none of the four players in for 10 is ever going to call with a dominated ace or king, but that assumption seems implausible.)
Last edited by AKQJ10; 07-20-2018 at 11:17 PM.