Quote:
Originally Posted by JackB03
I still think a Cbet without shoving is ok. Why risk your whole stack, when a smaller bet will scare them off. I say this because of there history. I doubt these players pay attention to pot sizes, etc... I could be wrong. Thats why I said shoving wouldnt be a bad idea either. My point is, I wouldnt shove here this early in the game, without more information on my opponents.
This is really, really bad thinking imo..
First and foremost, you usually have at least 25% equity here when somebody shoves. So if you bet anything more than $21, you are automatically priced into a calling a shove. (111 to win 336). So cbetting something like $80 and folding to a shove when you're getting 7.6:1 is hugely, hugely unprofitable; just setting $$ on fire imo.
Second, making such an unprofitable play as bet/folding when the pot odds dictate otherwise and then justifying it because you opponents aren't paying attention to pot odds is pretty lol.
Furthermore, shoving gives you maximum fold equity against any small pairs that might be able to find a fold while at the same time disguising your value hands (e.g. you're shoving all of your value hands also.)
Finally, the only reason to ever have a range for betting less than all-in here is to snap call a shove. e.g. if you think one of your opponents can check/shove something like AJ or QK here, you might bet less than allin to induce him to do that. But that won't be the case most of the time.
In summary, this is a felt or check situation. Finding a fold on this flop after it has been checked to you is not an option.