Villain is an WG 60-70yrs. Never saw him
before, but he knows some regs on the table.
Seens aggro and overprotective.

Recorded with Pokerbase. Replay with web replayer.
Sat, May 25, 2019 9:37 AM
1/2 NLHE at Casino Gran Via

SB starts with 321.
BB starts with 200.
UTG starts with 200.
MP starts with 110.
MP+1 starts with 320.
LJ starts with 200.
HJ starts with 200.
CO starts with 200.
BTN starts with 200.

Hero is MP+1 with AA

SB posts sb 1.
BB posts bb 2.

MP calls (2).
MP+1 raises to 15.
CO calls (15).
MP calls (13).

Pot 48.
*Flop* comes Q 3 4.

MP bets 95 (allin).
MP+1 folds.
CO folds.

you don't need him to be shoving that much crap
sets and AQ alone and you're printing

I really dont see him OL/C with AQ.
Its more like AA, KK, QQ, 33, 44, 34 imo.

With that I have something like 40% equity on a 40% potodds.
With the rake it can be slightly EV-.

I block Ad (possible bluffs).
Dont see him dk overbeting with QJ and QT.

It seemed like a good fold while I was playing, but now I’m not that sure.

I’m never folding Aces to a short-stack jam in this situation. This is especially the case when I have the Ad and the V is a Spaniard.

Trivial call without crazy reads.

Snap

I’m not convinced yet hahaha
It seens such a strong move to me the 200% pot bet that the only combos i can see i’m winning are the KK hands.

*Folds aces on a wet board*

smh.

Don't ask for feedback if you don't want it. This is a snap call and it's not close.

I guess you're posting because you either (probably) folded the best hand and are sad about it or (less likely) he showed you something ridiculous like Q3 and you feel bad about being beaten by a moron.

Snap call

V's range has a gazillion Qx hands. Snap this all day. You will lose to 33/44 sometimes.

easy call. Is OMC doing this because he's terrified of that texture? Absolutely. But you know what hands he thinks he has to "protect"? Literally any top pair and everything else.

I do want the feedback, that why i’m posting on the first place.
Bad read, mate, it would cost you some money on the table.

I’m not sad by the fold. Mainly because i just said i’m not convinced yet.
I still think it was a good fold, and of course it could be due to some intuition and some thing in my unconscious competence that I just can’t explain due to the table texture and villains background.

I see now that 100% of the comments are for a snapcall, and its good. I appreciate that. Thank you all for the feedback. Next time I will be more carefull folding rockets.

But i still think that on THIS ocasion it was a good fold (he did not showed Q3, and if he did it would just be a confirmation of a good fold when I didnt had the odds to call lol).

A question, tho, to keep up with the theme.

If I had really good reasons to believe he would only do that with AA, KK, QQ, 44, 33 (giving me 41% equity on a 40% potodds), puting the rake on the account it would be a -EV move to call that bet. Close, but -EV.

Of course that if we put all the Qs, it would give us a snapcall, and that’s why I think everybody is saying that.
I just can’t see any Qs that make sense.

Your aggro read should have help.

This looks like a call to me unless I have a read that he is the really passive, I don't see why he cant have AQ. Could have 56d 45d?

Cant see him OL/C with AQ from UTG+1. He was ORaising good combos.
He could have QJ and QT, but I don’t see him Dk Shoving this hands after my ISO 7,5x and a call.

45d and 56d are such good hands to call vs 2 (monster draws), but yeah.... He could have em. This hands also have alot of equity vs my AA.



It’s a close call if he have no TP. With the rake, something close to underEV.
Having one more player left to act after i call (with better odds) can transform my AA into a marginal hand.
The other player also have FDs, sets and 2Ps on his range.

isn't rake capped?

It isn’t.

so if the pot is 1000, they take what 100?

You dont think he limps AQ but what kind of player bets 2x pot with a made hand? A scared player. And what do scared players do with hands like AQ? They limp.