Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
AA on flop AA on flop

11-02-2017 , 09:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TenHighCallDown
......Call or fold all-in decisions really are fundamentally as simple as comparing your pot odds to your equity.
^ see bold text

You wrong here too. Call or fold is comparing pot odds to villain bluffing FREQUENCY on his shoves. Your equity is the hot-and-cold run into the simulator and don't matter if villain bluffs less then the pot odds.
AA on flop Quote
11-02-2017 , 09:50 PM
kk gl
AA on flop Quote
11-02-2017 , 10:20 PM
Fold
AA on flop Quote
11-02-2017 , 10:46 PM
Baluga Theorem is in regards to one pair hands facing a turn raise. This is a flop raise.

Quote:
......Call or fold all-in decisions really are fundamentally as simple as comparing your pot odds to your equity.
Yes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenghisKhan
^ see bold text

You wrong here too. Call or fold is comparing pot odds to villain bluffing FREQUENCY on his shoves. Your equity is the hot-and-cold run into the simulator and don't matter if villain bluffs less then the pot odds.
No. Non. Nyet. Bluffing frequency affects your equity. They are completely tied together. Most of what GhengisKhan has posted ITT is completely nonsense..
AA on flop Quote
11-02-2017 , 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenghisKhan
^ see bold text

You wrong here too. Call or fold is comparing pot odds to villain bluffing FREQUENCY on his shoves. Your equity is the hot-and-cold run into the simulator and don't matter if villain bluffs less then the pot odds.
this is gibberish obviously.
AA on flop Quote
11-02-2017 , 10:54 PM
Sorry Garick, hadn't refreshed the page to see your post.
AA on flop Quote
11-02-2017 , 11:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
Baluga Theorem is in regards to one pair hands facing a turn raise. This is a flop raise.


Yes.

No. Non. Nyet. Bluffing frequency affects your equity. They are completely tied together. Most of what GhengisKhan has posted ITT is completely nonsense..
Nyet too,
Well, when you call because as you said you have 35% equity that means you are sure villain bluffs 35% or more on his shoves with the hand he represents. All that means is he's bluffing 1 out of 3 situations. Now, player in small games don't bluff even close to that rate to be profitable to sniff their infrequent bluffs.

Amen!, ..., you guys have no idea because obviously don't have much experience in this game. I understand and I can see that you are at the beginning of your journey into the dark side of poker.
AA on flop Quote
11-03-2017 , 12:16 AM
Not even close. If you have 35% equity, that means that when you add up all of his combos of bluffs (against which you have excellent equity, but they could still hit runner runner on you), semi-bluffs (which you are doing pretty well against, but have a much better chance of hitting), value (against which you may have counterfeit outs, as well as your 2-outer) and monsters, you have a 35% chance of winning the hand.

You are correct that LLSNL players bluff rarely. That is why you give them few combos of bluffs when figuring your equity. You don't do this by "inputting bluffing frequency," which is meaningless in and of itself, but discounted numbers of combos, along with all of the other combos of semi-bluff (discounted or not depending on V type), value and monsters, and seeing what comes out in the wash.

You clearly have no idea what you are trying to say and your condescending attitude and fake numbers are likely confusing a lot of beginning posters, so I'm going to ask you to stop posting in this forum. If you are convinced that you are thinking at a deeper level, it will clearly be more valued in a higher level forum, and since you tell us often that you are a mid-stakes player, may I suggest that you post there instead.
AA on flop Quote
11-03-2017 , 06:01 AM
jacketchanwtf.jpg
AA on flop Quote

      
m