Quote:
Originally Posted by Nh,gg.
Disagree. While dropping the probability of the field having your blocker by 1/4 is quite nice, solely limiting your bluffing range to things like AXo, KXs, makes you more predictable than also including things like SCs and suited 1 and 2 offs. Assuming any Vs are even paying attention to what you do and 3b with, of course.
Moreover---and this should be very applicable for the deep games you've posted here---SCs and one-offs are the sort of speculative hand that can pay off deep. Though true, it's tougher to do it OOP, and there are large RIO concerns if the FD comes in.
Certainly it goes in the trash most times. I'm not sure I could get it through the two described Vs, PF in the OP. And when we don't, we usually don't flop well enough to continue. I'm merely objecting to the "never" portion of your statement.
Lot's of fancy words, but that doesn't make any of it true.
GTO never 3bets 75s from the SB, not even against a BTN open.
That is 100bb deep, might be different for these effective stacks, but I think 3betting deeper is an even bigger mistake.
If you want to balance, at least go with suited connectors, GTO uses 98s, 87s and 76s mostly.
We actually should almost never be 3 betting against an EP/MP open from the SB.
I am using simplified GTO ranges, so maybe it does use 75s a very small percentage of the time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmahaDonk
Agree with last couple of posts. There are times before I look at my cards where I know I’m 3b with any broadways or suited connectors/1 gap. Sometimes it’s a good spot for a variety of reasons
I did mention a reliable live read can change this.