Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
5/5 re-raise w/ straight OTT, or flat? 5/5 re-raise w/ straight OTT, or flat?

09-14-2017 , 12:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathCabForTootie
Just ****ing listen Avarita. Seriously. He put into terms what I had in mind but am too ******ed to be able to write.

PLO makes one a better NLHE player for sure. I definitely cbet/bluff multi way now than used to.
Listen TO Avarita. Listen TO him.
5/5 re-raise w/ straight OTT, or flat? Quote
09-14-2017 , 12:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avaritia
Betting in a limped pot with a bare open ender with 1 or 2 or 7 or whatever people still ip on us 6 ways on specifically a JTx flop with 9 high is bad. Its not debatable.

There is also a very large difference between 89 and Q9.
You'd like it a lot more on k76r?
5/5 re-raise w/ straight OTT, or flat? Quote
09-14-2017 , 12:36 AM
@avaritia & @deathcabfortootie,

Thanks for responses. Food for thought indeed.
5/5 re-raise w/ straight OTT, or flat? Quote
09-14-2017 , 12:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eholeing
You'd like it a lot more on k76r?
Betting on a K76r board in a limped pot (especially if we have a BDFD) is A LOT better than bluffing on this board IMO.

1. We have 8 outs to the nuts rather than 4.
2. If a 5 comes, we have a chance to cooler someone playing 43 in a limped pot (or less likely 84).
3. Harder for the limpers to have top pair on a K-high board than a J-high board. People are more likely to raise hands with a K in them (KT+) or fold them.
4. If we get called, often it's by 7x or 6x or a pocket pair like 88 or 99. A lot of scare cards for those hands that don't make two pair. For instance, if a Q or J hits. Compare that to JT5, where it's much harder to call with 99 or 88, and the scare cards, A or K, often give someone two pair, a straight or a OESD. So a lot more good cards to double barrel.
5. If we bet we can fold out better 9s or 8s that missed, and then buy ourselves extra outs against 7x or 6x when we make second pair. Getting J9 or Q9 to fold is great. Compare that again to JT5, where a 9 or 8 is seldom an out when called.
5/5 re-raise w/ straight OTT, or flat? Quote
09-14-2017 , 01:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avaritia
Its hard for me to explain this without just saying "play more plo" but really this becomes a pretty standard spot after you've played plo.

In live plo it is generally unwise to bet oop with draws, even strong draws, in multiway fields. This is because there is very little fold equity, especially in limped pots on connected boards. And when you bet a draw you generally want fold equity because well, you have 9 high. There are other reasons for being passive in these spots, such as not wanting to get folded off of your own equity.

Plo also helps you think about every single turn card. I never thought like this playing nlh but plo I'm literally running 47 cards (in groupings ldo) through my head otf.

On this flop with 98, there are only 4 great turn cards for us. The 7s. They also dont overnut anyone, and when we produce significant action, our hand will be face up.

Some "good" turn cards would be the clubs, but upon examination we need to realize they arent created equal.

The A,K,J clubs are relatively bad turn barrels. This is bc a villain flop continuing range on JTx is going to be broadway heavy and will either make a straight, an open ender, a gutshot, trips, or 2 pair.

The other clubs, 2,3,4,5,6 arent great barrels either, bc they are not scare cards. As you see, on JTx textures you really have a catch 22 bc normally good scare cards (overcards) are not scare cards as they favor a continuing range and good cards (2-6) dont fold out alot of the flop continuing range. Yes clubs help maintain our equity which is great and all but we'll still need fold equity with it.

Even a Q, which gives us our straight, completes K9 which most certainly calls $15 otf. It also gives KJ/T an open ender (cards that maintain equity for villain are important).

So Q9 would be a much better bet here, and KQ even more so, bc they have more equity, turn more equity, turn/river more pair value, and can overnut people, as just a few reasons.

I would bet a 237 flop, possibly even 6 ways, with 89 before I would bet OP's flop. That is because overcard club turns are GREAT for us with both fold equity and real equity, because its such a dry texture we might just have fold equity otf, because we have pair outs, and because we have 2 three card draws to the effective nuts.

But i bet a lot of people would check the 237. So you see, its not as simple as "i haz open ender...i bet". There are alot of considerations, and 89 on JTx can be a crappier hand than 89 on 237 in a limped pot 6 ways
OK, I buy it; betting flop is not good.

Thank you.
5/5 re-raise w/ straight OTT, or flat? Quote
09-15-2017 , 01:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathCabForTootie
Betting flop is spew TBH. waaaaay too multi-way, even with the BDFD

bet more OTF, AP jam turn
The message from this thread is recognizing how the average poker player plays.

They're totally okay with total passivity praying to hit a hand, and then when they get lucky they turn super aggressive to ensure that nobody misses that they play poker in a totally face-up manner.

The very funny thing is that given that attitude --- if this hand was from the Villain's perspective nobody would be in favor of folding any halfway decent hand to a turn shove, even though Hero waits for the nuts to shove. That's why everyone hates hands where the hero switches places with the Villain.

TLDR -> The author of this thread played the hand perfectly fine.
5/5 re-raise w/ straight OTT, or flat? Quote
09-15-2017 , 10:16 AM
Thank God we have your opinion and your crushing ways.
5/5 re-raise w/ straight OTT, or flat? Quote
09-15-2017 , 10:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by au4all
The message from this thread is recognizing how the average poker player plays.

They're totally okay with total passivity praying to hit a hand, and then when they get lucky they turn super aggressive to ensure that nobody misses that they play poker in a totally face-up manner.

The very funny thing is that given that attitude --- if this hand was from the Villain's perspective nobody would be in favor of folding any halfway decent hand to a turn shove, even though Hero waits for the nuts to shove. That's why everyone hates hands where the hero switches places with the Villain.

TLDR -> The author of this thread played the hand perfectly fine.
I think this is completely wrong. If this hand was from V's perspective, and we were faced with a re-raise shove in a limped pot on a card that makes a very common limping hand, 98, the nuts, a lot of people would advocate folding.
5/5 re-raise w/ straight OTT, or flat? Quote
09-15-2017 , 02:54 PM
From a theory perspective, anywhere we have a value bet (55, JT), we simply need bluffs as well. So ya we have Q9, but is that enough? Well, judging by how we have plenty of equity with these bluffs, we can bluff far more. Playing against several villains means we bluff less (far less vs 5), but being in position against most of them swings it back in favor of betting a lot. So in this spot, we have position on 3 villains, while 2 have position on us. If we bet 12 value combos, we can easily bet 32 bluff combos.
Imagine if you are a villain on the button with like J7. If you know that hero is betting 12 value combos where you are crushed, and 16 bluffs (only Q9 where you are still only 66%), what would you do? The answer is fold, ainec. Even in position. There is literally no way to way to make up that equity disadvantage. Not only that, but a polarized range has an inherent advantage over a condensed range. Ie the polarized knows when they are ahead, the condensed doesnt. Condensed range sometimes calls when they are behind and folds when they are ahead. Polarized range never does this. Only betting Q9 is very exploitable. Betting Q9 and 89 evens that out almost perfectly.
Now if you know that the whole table are fish calling every bet, then sure, only bet your value. But even then, betting with 89 and getting called in 3 or 4 spots is borderline more profitable than checking (and almost certainly is profitable against droolers). And if anyone at the table is competent, they will exploit you like crazy.

Ps. QK should be raised pre, so I don't think that should be in our range. Not that that would be a better bluff anyways (It wouldn't).
5/5 re-raise w/ straight OTT, or flat? Quote
09-15-2017 , 03:01 PM
Outdonked?
5/5 re-raise w/ straight OTT, or flat? Quote
09-15-2017 , 03:01 PM
Pardner?
5/5 re-raise w/ straight OTT, or flat? Quote

      
m