Quote:
Originally Posted by iwannapoker
This isn't a dissertation. I'm not going to provide footnotes. The 40% is very basic net present value economics math.
It's not a net (expect) present value calculation it's just a net expected value calculation. If you think I'm wrong then tell me what your discount rate is for turn and river cards.
I terms of equity we actually have here... A rough estimate is each out is worth 2% on turn, 4% to turn and river. The 4% linear estimate breaks down when we have lots of outs, but we can use this chart
https://thetapoker.com/outs.html instead. Also have to calculate dodging villain redraws. Better to just run an equity calculator but I'm being lazy so whatever.
9 spades, 3 non spade J, 3 non spade T = 15 outs = 32% to just hit on turn and 54% to hit on either turn or river. The turn &river equity is most relevant because jamming ensures we see both those cards. Anyways, 54% is much better than 40%. So heads up against a villain with no redraws this is for value. You can tune that up or down depending on what you think are in people's hands or just run the real equity calc.
Also, go back and review semi-bluffing math. When you have a lot of equity you don't need villain to fold often to make semi-bluffing +EV. Doesn't mean it's the highest EV, but it's def not negative.