Six handed 2/5 $1000 buy in game. People are generally playing snug but I'm familiar with these guys and play them with exploitative style.
H ($750): snug image, kind of card dead.
V ($1300): typically loose passive but can sometimes get a stuck up his ass and fight for pots in random ways. Doesn't like to fold and will call with stupid stuff just because.
MP ($1200): tight passive, fit or fold
MP raise to $15, V (BTN) calls, H (BB) calls with K
Q
Flop ($47): K
6
5
H checks, MP bets $30, V calls, Hero raises to $125, MP folds, V calls.
I raised flop for value and I don't want to see a lot of turn cards 3 ways. We are deep enough to maneuver and I want to raise this with draws and want to be able to balance with value. This is probably the bottom of my value range.
Most rational players will have a very tight continuing range on the flop but this one fights for pots a bunch. I have a hard time ranging him here so this leads to discomfort later. I'm guessing any Kx, 65, 55, 78, any flush draw, some random gutshots. He's definitely the kind of player to see my stack size and call $90 like it isn't anything special.
Turn ($330) 4
Hero checks, BTN bets $90, Hero calls.
I don't know if I should bet the turn, seems like a bad idea since better calls and worse folds. I can sometimes check a flush to this player since I think he will fight for this pot on a card like this. The bet size is so weird, I feel like it is a feeler bet or a milking bet. At this point I'm not having any better time ranging him.
River ($510) 4
Hero checks, BTN bets $350, Hero folds.
Should I have played the turn or river differently? I had this bad feeling that I induced a bluff then folded to it. Then again tree fiddy feels like a value size. Thoughts on other lines appreciated too.