Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
2/5 Second nuts Deep 2/5 Second nuts Deep

03-08-2017 , 02:38 PM
I need to see those results or I am going to go crazy.

Last call for me: V1 has a set or Aces. V2 has an overpair, the 1st nut straight or A-5.

I would cut the nut straight from V1 if he didn't snap call (which I can't tell from your intro).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins 47
Most rec fish don't know what middle position is. Again I'm calling and quickly but to rule out 64 suited or even 64os because it doesn't make sense to you (a thinking player I assume since you're on this forum) is stupid. We can't assume that because we wouldn't call a tiny 3 bet in mp with 64 that a brain dead rec fish wouldn't.
That's reasonable. I am actually pretty new. I have played some 2/5 over in Elgin, but mostly tournament poker. I am not ruling out 6-4, I just think it is unlikely and overpairs are a lot more likely in their ranges, especially V2.

Last edited by Nippleman; 03-08-2017 at 02:43 PM.
2/5 Second nuts Deep Quote
03-08-2017 , 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nippleman
I need to see those results or I am going to go crazy.

Last call for me: V1 has a set or Aces. V2 has an overpair, the 1st nut straight or A-5.

I would cut the nut straight from V1 if he didn't snap call (which I can't tell from your intro).



That's reasonable. I am actually pretty new. I have played some 2/5 over in Elgin, but mostly tournament poker. I am not ruling out 6-4, I just think it is unlikely and overpairs are a lot more likely in their ranges, especially V2.
It is unlikely and villains ranges can be way weirder and wider than we think and I'm never folding this unless one of them is an ultra nit that I know 100% wouldn't be all in without the nizzles.

Last edited by Redskins 47; 03-08-2017 at 03:15 PM.
2/5 Second nuts Deep Quote
03-08-2017 , 02:52 PM
GRUNCH: if you are V1 and you hold 64, would you take this line? Get it in there and hold on to your a$$!
2/5 Second nuts Deep Quote
03-08-2017 , 02:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins 47
It is unlikely and villains ranges can be way wider than we think and I'm never folding this unless one of them is an ultra nit that I know 100% wouldn't be all in without the nizzles.
Agreed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SillyRabbit
GRUNCH: if you are V1 and you hold 64, would you take this line? Get it in there and hold on to your a$$!
V1 I think would just call if he is hoping to string them along with 6-4. Which is why I think if anyone has 6-4, it's V2 as his raise there feels like he is pot committing himself pretty early for a mere top pair.
2/5 Second nuts Deep Quote
03-08-2017 , 05:38 PM
Not gonna get much more discussion around this hand. Results OP?
2/5 Second nuts Deep Quote
03-08-2017 , 05:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SillyRabbit
GRUNCH: if you are V1 and you hold 64, would you take this line? Get it in there and hold on to your a$$!
I wouldn't but it is pretty common in live low stakes games for players to freak out omg I flopped the nuts and go all in.
2/5 Second nuts Deep Quote
03-08-2017 , 06:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nippleman
I need to see those results or I am going to go crazy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins 47
Results OP?
results don't matter
2/5 Second nuts Deep Quote
03-08-2017 , 07:17 PM
V1 shows 6c4c

V2 shows JcJd

I called. I had the second nuts and a blocker. Oh well. My only concern was how deep we were and if folding was a consideration due to stack size.
2/5 Second nuts Deep Quote
03-08-2017 , 07:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Playbig2000
results don't matter

Thanks tips. I still like to know.
2/5 Second nuts Deep Quote
03-08-2017 , 07:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by D_Lonnigan
V1 shows 6c4c

V2 shows JcJd

I called. I had the second nuts and a blocker. Oh well. My only concern was how deep we were and if folding was a consideration due to stack size.
Oof. Ul op.
2/5 Second nuts Deep Quote

      
m