Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
2/5 QTs Line Check 2/5 QTs Line Check

04-13-2021 , 12:14 PM
2/5, 7 handed, $700 effective. Villain is pretty much a complete unknown. He's been at the table for 1-2 rotations, I saw him call a 3x raise from BB three ways and x-f a KT9r board, and I also saw him open 3x OTB and both blinds folded. That's all I have.

OTTH

Hero opens Q T $20 HJ, villain calls CO.

Flop ($47): 4 4 2. Hero bets $15-villain calls. I do a shitload of checking OOP, but I feel like betting is right on this board? Paired flops tend to be some of the better boards for our range. I feel like this c bet is profitable versus the population.

I plugged a few ranges into Flopzilla for CO. I started by giving him the GTO CO v HJ range 3 betting range that just flats, but took out the top of the range (JJ+, AKs, AKo) since the population is very passive pre. Going off of the population I doubt he's this tight, but with that being said this range shows his K high or worse to make up 31.96% of his range otf, which I feel like the average unknown would fold here.

I tried giving him a little bit of a looser range by adding in the rest of the suited As, pairs, suited broadways, and all offsuit broadways besides KTo, QTo, and JTo, and now his K high or worse is 34.22%.

Without getting too crazy, I loosened his range to include most of the suited connectors, the better suited gappers, K9s, and Q9s. This range has K high or worse 51.71% of the time.

It seems going off of this, that a c bet is most likely profitable. In your experience, do people flat with K high here?

Turn ($77): Q. Hero bets $25-villain raises to $85 and hero folds. I chose a small size again, because I expect most players to call 55-TT, maybe even A high here versus a small size, but to probably ditch these hands versus a large size. I could see an argument for checking, but I preferred going for value in the moment.

Turn raises are super nutted at LLSNL. Versus the small size I suppose he could be doing this with Qx, but the only Q that I think is for sure in his range is AQ. If he did float with KQ as well that's ahead of us. I don't see the population ever flatting 55-TT otf and now bluffing the turn. This seemed like a bad spot to call.

Thoughts?
2/5 QTs Line Check Quote
04-13-2021 , 12:33 PM
Call turn. He will float flop with a bunch of hands vs your 1/3 sizing that have air OTT. His line looks bluffy and he doesn't have much 4x + you block his Qx.

Flop is an OB spot.
2/5 QTs Line Check Quote
04-13-2021 , 02:34 PM
If I'm V and you bet 1/3 flop & 1/3 turn I'm raising here even with zero equity other than FE as you've shown no interest it the pot thus far
2/5 QTs Line Check Quote
04-13-2021 , 02:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowman
If I'm V and you bet 1/3 flop & 1/3 turn I'm raising here even with zero equity other than FE as you've shown no interest it the pot thus far
Exactly
2/5 QTs Line Check Quote
04-13-2021 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DooDooPoker
Call turn. He will float flop with a bunch of hands vs your 1/3 sizing that have air OTT. His line looks bluffy and he doesn't have much 4x + you block his Qx.

Flop is an OB spot.
That makes sense. It was definitely an exploit fold as turn raises tend to be super nutted. I can see why you're arguing to call turn though.
2/5 QTs Line Check Quote
04-13-2021 , 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DooDooPoker
Exactly
Really? I thought his response made no sense and was really bad advice, especially considering how stationary the population is. I mean I would've played QQ+ the same way.
2/5 QTs Line Check Quote
04-13-2021 , 02:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixsevenoff
That makes sense. It was definitely an exploit fold as turn raises tend to be super nutted. I can see why you're arguing to call turn though.
Fishy players hate small cbets since they don't want to fold + they don't really want to call with air. So they just conclude that raising is the best play.

You should try this line for value a few times and see how it works. It might be higher EV overall as an exploit.
2/5 QTs Line Check Quote
04-13-2021 , 02:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixsevenoff
Really? I thought his response made no sense and was really bad advice, especially considering how stationary the population is. I mean I would've played QQ+ the same way.
Yeah but he doesn't know that.
2/5 QTs Line Check Quote
04-13-2021 , 04:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixsevenoff
Really? I thought his response made no sense and was really bad advice, especially considering how stationary the population is. I mean I would've played QQ+ the same way.
we both said the same thing
I just said it from V's point of view

had you made a real bet on the turn and got raised that's different
2/5 QTs Line Check Quote
04-13-2021 , 09:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowman
we both said the same thing
I just said it from V's point of view

had you made a real bet on the turn and got raised that's different
I'm saying I wouldn't advise raising with zero equity in this spot. DooDooPoker didn't say to raise here with zero equity in his original post.
2/5 QTs Line Check Quote
04-13-2021 , 10:01 PM
Yeah when I said exactly I was referring to how I think a standard 2/5 player would think about this spot.

No we shouldn't be raising OTT with air.
2/5 QTs Line Check Quote
04-15-2021 , 01:52 AM
If villian is gonna bet his whole range on the turn because we have not shown enough interest then check calling seems to be pretty cool.
2/5 QTs Line Check Quote

      
m