Quote:
Originally Posted by bodybuilder32
Lol. Take a break from posting man...you are in every thread and I think your brain is fried.
Not raising here is criminal. This is a classic blocker bet from a fish. He probably has Kxhh and only now realizes his hand is vulnerable on the river but thought he had a monster on the turn. Possibly a slowplayed AA that thought he was being trappy on the flop.
He's never betting $200 into $1350 with a motherf***** full house.
Not so sure Ragequit is wrong. The issue is that the conclusion seems near inescapable that he has lied about his hand, either OTF or OTT. If he's lying OTT then he's bluffing and we don't need to raise. If he's lying OTF... your proposal is that he has Kx or AA there. I find the idea that an inexperienced player checks those hands there less believable than him betting 200 OTR with a boat, given the information about his cluelessness with sizing and given how bizarrely people tend to play when they flop the nuts.
The other alternative is that he's not lying at any point, which involves having exactly 65s. I think it would be kind of inconsistent though for him to be aggressive enough to raise 65s pre, but passive enough to check his gutshot OTF on an obvious cbetting board. He appears to show in H1 that he knows what cbetting is.
This is one of those hands that it's pretty hard to give advice on because it's not really a poker theory question, the question is "what kind of player is V exactly" and we only have OP's presentation of him to go on. Like it's possible OP is overemphasising this guy's difficulty with sizing and underemphasising him just being a complete button masher, in which case my whole post here is drivel. I could definitely imagine either flatting or jamming here at the table depending on my exact impression of V.