Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosInEquilibrium
Your Villain 4bet range is strikingly wide. You guys must have history. In optimal play he’s not supposed to be 4betting with JJ/TT at all. This is because your BB 3bet range is supposed to be polar. You’re getting a good price to complete, which is what you’d like to do with most of the middle of your range. So your 3bet range is gonna consist of your best hands {JJ+,AK,AQs,KQs, maybe TT}, and then the worst hands that can’t afford to complete the 2 bbs, mostly suited trash like {85s, etc.}. In response to that BB 3bet range, MP 4bet range would look a lot more like what you wrote above, {QQ+,AK} — very tight. 4betting with TT against a polar 3bet range is just lighting money on fire.
If you give him QQ+,AK, plus partials of some random blocker bluffs like KQo, I think we’re getting a good price to flat his 4bet and play some poker. We’ll probably have to continue on some low flops depending on his c-bet sizing.
Re 5bets: If we 5bet AKo all the time we’ll be 5betting way too much as a bluff, so, I’d just look to 5bet AKs, AA, maybe partial of KK,, likely to 450 or so.
Edit: If he is really as wide as you say, and has all combos of TT+ and AQs (which are not in an optimal 4bet range AFAIK), then I could get on board with a 5bet with AKo to 400-450.
Fair point. If we remove TT and JJ from his 4bet range then AK doesn't really look so great.
QQ (6 combos) we flip but have RIO when an A/K flops.
KK,AA(6 combos) almost nothing against AA, we have 3 outs against KK with RIO
AK (9 combos only 2 suited as we have AKo) - here we chop but are OOP and will face more action not knowing whether Im owning myself against QQ+ or chopping.
I guess being "nitty" is the best play.
Sent from my Pixel 4a (5G) using Tapatalk