Quote:
Originally Posted by PFunkaliscious
just ignore this jibberish. to range the villian with a possible FD when he has position and would just call 95% of the time is just silly. and then describing the hand as butchered is even sillier.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PFunkaliscious
V min clicking it back on the flop is super strong and is repping a set, so nothing wrong with the fold.
I generally like your posts, so for constructive reasons can you explain your thought process? I actually believe your assumptions are leaks, and I'd like to absorb how they aren't.
Given the lack of info, how can you so assuredly dismiss most FDs as jibberish, yet at the same time reliably assign weight to such a super narrow 7 combos just from his UTG limp, bet small, min 3b line? Further, how are you able to dismiss 21 OP combos from his range that reasonably might take the same line.? Doing so incorrectly costs hero at least 20% in equity by the riv and drastically alters the decision tree incorrectly.
I maintain that a ck-c is always better than a ck-r for reasons I made in my first post. (And yea betting is better too) Narrowing V here while narrowing ourselves is not in the best interest of this strong of a draw in a limped pot, and that in and of itself is another pretty substantial leak that I observe many good players doing. It's another issue entirely, and there often are times when polarizing OOP with a draw this strong is going to have its benefits, but when the pot is so small and we can get 3 players to see a turn, a call is far and above the better of the two lines discussed.
Backing up to Vs range, OK, given no reads we should play as straight up as possible. Until he's evidenced to be a clown capable of taking this line with a naked FD, we can assume he's less weighted in them, but again, it's just not reasonable to assume his line and ridiculous sizing to be a range that hero has 30% equity against...