Wild and crazy 2/5. Most of the table is 200-400x deep or more.
V1 is a midstakes limit reg who I have a lot of history with (mostly at LHE). He's really good at LHE and he's pretty solid at NL too. He was playing too nitty this session though. He knows I played NL online for a living so he presumably thinks I'm good at it. We haven't gotten involved much at all this session, despite sitting next to each other deep.
V2 is a tatted up hispanic hoodrat looking dude. Playing like 70/20 and splashing around a lot post flop. Not much more of a read other than that he's a solid favorite to lose all of his money before he goes home (he ran his stack up from like $400).
V1 starts hand with ~$3k
V2 starts with ~$2k
Hero covers both
Hero is UTG+2 w/ K
K
V2 opens UTG for $20
V1 3-bets to $60
Hero calls
V2 has a huge limping range so his UTG raising range is on the stronger side
V1 hadn't done much 3-betting PF and this is a small 3-bet for the table.
I know people are going to say I should 4-bet here but 4-betting PF in this game just wasn't done by anybody ever. If I make it 220 or something V1 is going to fold almost all of his range, perhaps everything other than QQ-AA, because he knows I'm never cold 4-betting him there without a monster. Perhaps V2 would still come along but again that bet would just look so strong I just felt like I'm taking the pot down PF there a huge % of the time - and that's not what I wanted to do.
So one more person comes along and V1 calls.
Flop Q
2
4
Check to V1 he bets $180, Hero calls, V2 makes it $380, V1 folds, Hero calls.
Turn T
V2 bets $400, Hero calls
River J
V2 checks, Hero checks.
Thoughts on all of that appreciated, particularly my decision to check back the river.
Last edited by venice10; 10-17-2014 at 10:00 PM.
Reason: Request of OP