Quote:
Originally Posted by SABR42
One doesn't have to be exclusively an online or live player. I consider myself both.
"Live crushers" without an online background almost always have super exploitable styles that do well vs fish but don't work vs players with strong fundamentals. And online players who aren't used to live aren't going to make the right adjustments to crush right away, or may not have the patience to sit there and fold for 5 hours when the cards don't come. There is always another hand a couple of seconds away online, but being able to fold for 5 hours without spewing is a surprisingly underrated ability.
In a vacuum, yes, online players are always going to be better, but if you say stuff like "I can beat high stakes live if I wanted to" but don't, then lol joke's on you, because if you could why aren't you doing it already? Either you can't or you choose not to make more money which is more lol.
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
Okay, maybe I exaggerated when I meant crushing any live table, but I'd definitely beat it for a decent winrate starting out. Esp when I know how live poker plays after roaming these forums for a # of years. And ofc over time & through practical experience, then crush.
Joke's on you because I'm not old enough to enter a casino for another 1 more year. Pretty lol and false assumption about me, like most of your other ones. If you're just gonna lol at my young age, I don't have anything else to add.
Also, ever heard of BRM? Even if I could, I obviously can't take 35BI for mid-stakes and jump into a high-stakes live game where the needed bankroll is obv much higher to avoid risk of ruin.
Last edited by Minatorr; 06-06-2017 at 09:04 PM.