2/5 Live.
Villain – 800. I cover.
Playing for a few hours. He is one of the better players at the table. Pretty tight (prob too tight for this table), we were sitting next to each other for a while before I changed seats and quietly discussed hands & stuff.
I have been more active than him, opening more frequently from LP, C-betting and taking down from loose passive players. I have been doing well and have the largest stack at the table by far.
I open QQ from EP to my standard 25. Folded to him in the cutoff. He makes it 80. He very rarely 3 bet during the hours we were playing together. I think I saw him do it twice. I opened from EP so Im pretty sure he doesn’t think Im up to my usual LP BS. So Im putting him on a pretty narrow range. Not even sure he would 3 bet JJ here. Way more skewed to AK, KK, AA.
I called 55 more. Even though I am OOP I think that 3 betting would be - oh I hope he has AK - semi-suicidal in this spot.
Pot - 170
Flop – Q
J
7
(some would call this a Favorable™ flop)
I check. I guess betting out would be interesting here, but checking cant be horrible.
He bet 115. He now has ~ 600 behind.
So Im obv OOP and can either smooth call on this pretty wet board that I have smashed and hope an action killer doesn’t come on the turn (maybe any diamond, an Ace if he has KK, another J or Q) and also hope he doesn’t spike his miracle card (prob an A, K or T).
Or I can 3 bet and hope I don’t scare him away. Im not sure I can extract multiple streets from him if he has an overpair and doesn’t improve. Earlier when I was sitting next to him he pretty easily dumped AK on a A93 RB flop when a tight player chk shoved on him with 99.
Its weird because this seems like a pretty standard spot that should have a "correct" answer, especially since Im confident in the narrow range Im putting him on which is a rare case, but I was pretty torn at the table between the 2 options.
?