Quote:
Originally Posted by BackDoorFlush
If your read is correct, then you should be snap 4-betting, as your hand has his range crushed.
Having his 3-bet range crushed isn't a reason to 4-bet. If we expect him to play mostly straight-forwardly against our 4-bet, folding all of his bluffs and shoving with something like QQ+ and AK, then we should be far more inclined to flat and take a flop. If we expect him to 5-bet shove some of his bluffs, or to have a range heavy in pairs like 77-TT that he folds to a 4-bet, or flat hands like AQ to a 4-bet, then 4-betting can become better, but that seems optimistic at LLSNL.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6betfold
4bet felt like slightly overplaying my hand against this player who has shown a tendency to be a little sticky preflop.. so I opted to just call..
Flop ($155) was KJ7r... V bet $110 into me... call
Turn ($375) is X.. V shoves for $315
Is there any X (turn card) we should be folding on?
If V is truly nitty, we can contemplate folding here even on blank turns, as we only have 24% equity against a range of AK, JJ, KK and AA and need 31%. We should definitely be folding on a Q turn since QQ is in his range as well and possibly KQ as well, and there really aren't any bluffs/semi-bluffs in his range anymore unless your read is way off.