Quote:
Originally Posted by jdr0317
FWIW I think we have more value than ~13 combos. And my guess is villain will be overfolding a bit here. Like he's gonna have a lot of 5x/77/etc in his range right? A lot of live guys don't make the decision based on their range and the math anyway.
You could be right! Maybe they are overfolding this river but I don't think so. They could for sure be overfolding flop and turn, but not this river. This river is actually a bad river for the 3bettor; we don't have a lot of flushes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdelore
This is a good post but can you tell me what better bluffs I can have here? I thought this would be a great hand to bluff since we don't block any broadway cards that we want V to have. And since I have this hand so rarely in my preflop range these flopped gutshots are going to be a pretty tiny portion of my bluff range.
This is a really bad river for the oop 3bettor; even though we have more nutted combos, we don't have enough stack depth left to leverage that polarity advantage. In other words, villain can just comfortably call his flushes and 9x. This is a product of us betting the flop with 100% range and betting this turn at a relatively high freq (~50%); OOP ends up with a lot more combos than we'd like to on the river (about ~67).
FWIW I ran this with the below ranges (and forcing an OOP 100% bet 1/3 potsize) and we're only betting this river like 30% of the time, IP has 330 EV and oop has only 206 EV.
86cc is a fine bet on the turn like I thought (still check/given up at some freq, but bet 4x as much), but on the river it's check/given up twice as much as bet, but still bet a low freq. So whatever man, this is a close spot either way and you shouldn't focus too much on it. The more important lesson for the river is to recognize that this river is actually a very bad river for the 3bettor and to not bet too frequently.
Side note 1: I was very surprised about the turn; it's not as good of a card for the 3bettor as I thought. It looks like a great card, but because we bet 100% range on flop, and our BB vs BTN 3bet range is actually pretty loose, we end up with a lot of junky hands (that's my guess why at least).
Side note 2: The IP player only folds 10% of the time to our cbet (lol). Now of course real players are going to fold much more (for example, IP is calling some % of A8dd, A8cc, T8cc, T8dd, KsQd, 100% of KJdd, KJcc, etc etc). Just kinda cool how little the IP player folds to the cbet even though oop has the EV advantage AND equity advantage on the flop. I guess it's a product of the value of position on dynamic boards!
EDIT for side note 3: I was curious if I put the flop folding range vs 1/3 potsize of the IP player to something more realistic (that I think even REALLY good regs are going to do). Basically I forced AJo no heart, KQo no heart, A4cc/dd, A8cc/dd, and (AT-AJ:KQ-KT:QJ-QT)cc/dd to fold instead of calling at some frequency. I think a lot of people are going to overfold a lot more than this, but even with this small adjustment it makes the OOP 3bettor bet 100% of their range on the flop. So ya, I like betting our range on the flop for sure.
And after making IP fold those types of hands on the flop then 86cc is almost never bet on the turn, and is definitely not bet on the river. So, ya.
OOP range
AA,KK,QQ,JJ,TT,99,AK,AQ,AJs,AJo:0.5,ATs,A9s:0.5,A8 s:0.5,A7s:0.5,A6s:0.5,A5s:0.5,A4s:0.5,A3s:0.5,A2s: 0.5,KQs,KQo:0.5,KJs,KTs:0.5,K9s:0.5,QJs,QTs:0.5,Q9 s:0.5,JTs,J9s:0.5,T9s:0.5,T8s:0.5,98s:0.5,97s:0.5, 87s:0.5,86s:0.5,76s:0.5,75s:0.5,65s:0.5,64s:0.5,54 s:0.5
IP range
99,88,77,66,55,44,33,22,AQ,AJ,ATs,A9s,A8s,A5s,A4s, KQ,KJs,KTs,K9s,QJs,QTs,Q9s,JTs,J9s,T9s,T8s,98s,97s ,87s,76s,65s
Last edited by Jarretman; 08-08-2018 at 11:44 PM.