Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
2/4 Fullhouse vs out of character aggression (possible straight flush) 2/4 Fullhouse vs out of character aggression (possible straight flush)

06-05-2013 , 11:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by moditude
Guess it totally means all QTs was definitely in his range there so I don't mind your flat call.

...

Don't think it's a clear shove anymore on river since he in fact showed up with A8s, didn't think that would be in his range.

Woop
A8 suited at QTo are pretty different in terms of limpability. Whether villain knows that, we don;t know for sure, but if he is semi-competent then he should. And I don't get the last sentence -- you can never make his pre-calling elasticity wider than his river-calling elasticity based on this info.

The most interesting question is whether he would have called a river raise, which we don't know. I think the inflection point for me is exactly AXss.
2/4 Fullhouse vs out of character aggression (possible straight flush) Quote
06-05-2013 , 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IronedSheik
A8 suited at QTo are pretty different in terms of limpability. Whether villain knows that, we don;t know for sure, but if he is semi-competent then he should. And I don't get the last sentence -- you can never make his pre-calling elasticity wider than his river-calling elasticity based on this info.

The most interesting question is whether he would have called a river raise, which we don't know. I think the inflection point for me is exactly AXss.
QTo i don't think, but combos of QTs make sense since A8s is in his limping range UTG. It's all in hindsight too though.

I'm not the villain but I was just trying to think about his river bet and whether it was an elaborate bet/fold or whether he would stack off with nut flush on a paired board.
2/4 Fullhouse vs out of character aggression (possible straight flush) Quote
06-05-2013 , 04:35 PM
One QTs left tho.
2/4 Fullhouse vs out of character aggression (possible straight flush) Quote
06-06-2013 , 07:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hfrog355
All things considered, I don't hate V's river bet from his perspective. It's not that efficient of a bet ($180 probably achieves the same result), but as long as he is capable of b/f, it makes the decision pretty easy as only better is coming over the top (he's got you flatting a FH).

Now that we've dissected the hand pretty thoroughly, I agree that flatting here is probably best. Not sure I could have arrived at that in game though.
Yeah i think we've dissected this hand pretty thoroughly haha thanks for the different point of views guys
2/4 Fullhouse vs out of character aggression (possible straight flush) Quote

      
m