The other day, I played this hand with a villain quite loose above all on late position with very much ROL and 3bets.
UTG2 OR 18
MP1 CALL
MP2 CALL
BU (VILLAIN) 72 with ATo (about 700)
BB (HERO) AI 224 with AKo
UTG2, MP1, MP2 FOLD
BU CALL
POT 502

BU must to pay 152 to 502 (30%)
Equity AKo vs AT 73%-27%
Board xxxxT and I lost
Ok, bad luck.

The point is not the hand itself.
The question is whether in a hand like this, I should consider:
- The villain has equity to pay with any two cards but a loose reasonable range of your 3bet is 77+, AT+, KQ
- It is more likely that other villain (utg or mp) has folded with Ax or Kx

And accordingly,
My hand: AKo
Range of villano: 77+, AT+, KQ
Dead cards: Ax
Equity: AKo 47,5% - 52,5% villain

I have put un the pot 0, the fold is a good option?

THANKS !!!

All in

U wanna fold 50bb deep vs a loose aggro fish with 20bbs dead money in the pot?

Sent from my SCH-I545 using 2+2 Forums

NH; WP. You can't assume a dead Ace or King there. There are a lot of opening and flatting hands that don't have either. Further, your opponent can't call your shove with most of the range you gave that actually has and equity advantage (low-mid PPs) as your 4-bet range that is PPs crushes them 80-20.

Also, you have a Pokerstove error in there. You're 57% against his range with no dead cards, but only drop to 53.6% with a dead ace.

Given your equity advantage and your FE, this is a shove all day long.

easy ship

if you were much deeper and you had better reads that v is tight, then a fold is fine

Thanks to everyone for your support !!!

Yes Garick, you are right about equity, thanks
I think that there's a ace by the sequence. I think it's very easy but .... we will never know ....