Villain 1: middle age, LAG, 700$, MP. Has been raising close to 50% of hands and took down most of them. Played with him before and he is always fairly aggresive, not a manic though, definatly a winning reg.
Hero: 700$, BTN, YWG, joined the table an hour orso ago, been all in twice already vs a manic in like 20 mins won 1 lost 1.

OTTH: 3 EP limpers, these guys are the kind of limpers who always call raises and never l/rr. Villain makes it 24 in MP (normal size). I look down at 79 I call assuming the limpers call and think this hand plays fine post. All limpers call.
Flop [120$]. 2510 checks to villain, he makes it 28$ I think for a bit and raise to 102$ (good size?) limpers fold, villain shoves for like 600$ total. Me???
I haven't seen villain bluff yet today, but if anyone will ever bluff here on the table it is def this villain.

close enough
do whatever tilts you less

Call

Call flop, re-evaluate turn, but raising/betting blanks then, most likely.

Edit: instead of raising flop

Flop is a clear raise/gii spot. Not deep enough to consider folding

Seems like we'd get action mostly from better flushes and Ax type hands. Calling keeps our range wider and we can see if we fade a spade on the turn. We also can re-evaluate based on his turn action/bet-size.

You want to gii with the naked nut flush draw. You let him get away on blank turns...

Letting the naked A draw for cheap is terrible. Between As and sets, we should have plenty of equity vs. his GII flop range.

Once he shoves though, his range tilts to made flushes as if he's on the naked Ace, he would know we're notvsemi-bluffing with the naked Ace which would tilt our range to made flushes.

I'm from easy pokerstive days, which I understand isn't available now. Let me see what I can find to run some equity calcs.