Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnHHolliday
TAG is probably a misnomer but definitely significantly tighter and more aggressive than the field ..I considered 3betting preflop and probably would lean more that way in the future.
It's tough to define TAG without a table dynamic tied to it. KQ (suited?) may very well be the bottom end of a TAG range at some (many) low limit games. Key more on the 'thinking' part of the description ...
The betting almost looks a little Nitty/Passive ... Feeler Flop bet even with a strong hand and a check when another scary card comes out on the Turn. Then ... BAM ... a polarizing (no really) bet on the River with a nutty hand.
A thinking reg 'sees' that even with top two he needs to get through two more cards on this table and JT is very possible with multiple callers. Then everything falls into place for him on the River after the table checks through a scare card.
I don't really like the 3-bet route 'that' often ...
1) How does his 3-bet flatting range do against your AJ? I think you are way behind AK/AQ and at best flipping v 99-JJ
1A) What does his IP 4-betting range include ... 99/TT? Big enough to include 'enough' flips? Doesn't matter, you're folding anyway ... If he's a thinking player he may think you are 3-betting lighter than he's opening.
2) Are you really expecting him to open wide enough to get enough folds from him .. and the rest of the table? The 3-bet might be totally appropriate for the rest of the table, but not this guy IMO. Do you really want him to fold out his AT/KQ hands?
3) TAGs tend to be pretty sticky with their chips, I don't like giving action to player's who wont give it back 'very' often.
On the other hand, if you are 'not' going to be able to get out of spots like the one you posted, then a 3-bet will make your decisions easier the rest of the hand and probably save you chips in the long run.
Win the war, not every battle ... GL