2/2 NL 99 3-bet pot 4 handed - Page 2 - Live Low-stakes No Limit Poker Forum

so was your read that he "will" 3bet AJs from the blinds after he told you he had ace high?

If your read on him before the hand was he will not 3bet anything less than QQ, you should have still folded pre without being results oriented

I knew beforehand he would 3bet there with AQ.

I believe he would in this spot probably 3bet with AJ too.

Remember we were 4-handed and everybody in the hand was probably quite weak.

UTG had 66 btw. He would have made Quads

Quote

03-09-2015 , 04:48 PM

#27

eyurus

grinder

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 598

Quote:

Originally Posted by Krumi

Remember we were 4-handed and everybody in the hand was probably quite weak.

Not sure if description was clear that table was only 4-handed, unless I missed it. When you say "UTG raised, I called on the button", I think most readers assume full table and everyone in between you guys folded. At least I did.

Quote

03-09-2015 , 05:45 PM

#28

Krumi

newbie

Join Date: Mar 2015 Posts: 17

Quote:

Originally Posted by eyurus

I see!

It was in the title though...
Next time I'll specify the table is 4 handed not the hand involved 4 players.

Quote

03-09-2015 , 07:09 PM

#29

fitzthetaxman

adept

Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 768

I still think if you aren't set mining this is a raise fold situation preflop. If you think Villain's range is only like AJs+ and bigger pairs then it is a pretty clear fold.

If you think it is like 77+, AJ+ and suited broadway hands it is probably closer and I wouldn't mind a shove pre-flop if you think you have any fold equity at all.

Otherwise you are going to find yourself in a bunch of guessing spots the majority of the time post. This hand is an example of that. You get about as good of a flop as you could ask for and you have no idea where you are.

Quote

Page 2 of 2

First

1 2

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 2 of 2

First

1 2

Last