Quote:
Originally Posted by Garick
Welcome to the forum, OP. In the future, please don't give away results, as it biases advice. I edited them out. As QuadJ mentioned, we really need to know more about SB before we can comment.
Thank you for editing my post and everyone that commented.
The SB was a relatively good player that I thought was a tight (20ish my guess VPIP) aggressive.
It makes a lot of sense to me now that leading the turn is the most profitable play, and the line of betting on the river makes minimal sense despite the opponent showing weakness on the river.