Quote:
Originally Posted by Minatorr
If you think most regs have iso raises way looser than their actual RFI, you’re wrong. It has nothing to do with being ABC or nitty. Isolating with 63s is often going to be very bad
I don't think most regs iso raise looser than their actual RFI. I think too many regs have that nit mindset where they think they need to tighten up cause they can't bluff a fish. And while it's true that you can't bluff three fish, you can easily bluff one fish. Especially when you have position which is why I'm a shameless seat changing bum hunter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minatorr
Some regs commonly have 60%+ RFI otb. Even thinking of Expanding that any higher for an iso raise just bc we have position on a fishalready just sounds ridiculous
60 is already pretty loose. Would only go that loose if the blinds are nits. But no, I said in a previous post if we go beyond 60 we're gonna have utter trash like Q6o which has little to no equity when called on too many boards. So if my RFI is already really high (like ATC if blinds are nitty enough), then yes I will make an exception and tighten up facing a limp from this fish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minatorr
You’re calling me a nit yet you’re not auto raising this flop (which you should be doing here with 9 high)? That’s funny
If you don't iso raise looser vs a fish with nits in the blinds (basically guaranteed a heads up pot in position which is the dream) then yes I'm calling you a nit. You're probably a good player, but that's a huge leak imo.
Also I never said raising flop was bad. I just think raising turn is better. I made this thread fully expecting to get heat for not raising flop but I don't mind sharing my thought process to see what other winning players are thinking. Again, we'll probably agree to disagree.