Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
1/3: TPTK+NFD facing flop bet from non-aggressor 1/3: TPTK+NFD facing flop bet from non-aggressor

11-13-2014 , 09:09 PM
Hero (UTG+1, $350ish): Nittiest player ever, never gets paid off as Vs know he has a hand if he bets...

V1 (UTG, $500): Decent, tight, middle-aged Asian player who chips up with the goods...

V2 (MP, $450): Aggro, young "online" guy, raises to $15 pre every 2-3 hands and fires cbets a lot, bluffs often, etc...


V1 limps,
Hero limps A7ss (getting tired of being card-dead, hoping to out-flush someone and V2 doesn't raise),
V2 raises to $15,
BB calls,
V1 calls,
Hero calls (priced-in, plan to get away from Axx boards)

Flop ($60): 5s 6s 7d
BB checks, V1 bets $35, Hero ???
1/3: TPTK+NFD facing flop bet from non-aggressor Quote
11-13-2014 , 09:22 PM
call if he is so nitty he propably has a set.

if you are the only caller you can bluff him off with 2 barrels when the 4 card straight appears, therfor i would also call the turn if he doesnt make it too big.

any chance he limp/calls another hand than a PP<99 here?

edit: if the 3-bettor raises and the nit moves allin, ouch that sucks.
1/3: TPTK+NFD facing flop bet from non-aggressor Quote
11-13-2014 , 09:27 PM
I don't limp in front of V2 unless I plan to l/rr when a good situation arises. Given our image and the tight callers in front, this is it.

As played, just flat. We draw to the nuts, and we can run some big bluffs on 4/8 turns/rivers.
1/3: TPTK+NFD facing flop bet from non-aggressor Quote
11-13-2014 , 10:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by surviva316
As played, just flat. We draw to the nuts, and we can run some big bluffs on 4/8 turns/rivers.
I feel like the problem with flatting with FDs here is our hand gets too obvious and it would get difficult to stack anyone on later streets. Also, if we miss, we just donated a huge % of our stack.
1/3: TPTK+NFD facing flop bet from non-aggressor Quote
11-13-2014 , 10:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fizzypants
I feel like the problem with flatting with FDs here is our hand gets too obvious and it would get difficult to stack anyone on later streets. Also, if we miss, we just donated a huge % of our stack.
you want to raise the set for that reason?
1/3: TPTK+NFD facing flop bet from non-aggressor Quote
11-13-2014 , 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fizzypants
I feel like the problem with flatting with FDs here is our hand gets too obvious and it would get difficult to stack anyone on later streets.
That's the nice thing about having the stone-cold, immortal mother-flippin' nuts. We can afford to build the pot once our hand is made because there is no amount of betting that will reduce the chances of us winning the pot. We even have the 7s for good measure to block the SF and paired board.

Of course it makes it *harder* for us to win as big of a pot, but the solution of building the pot before our hand is made kind of contradicts your other goal of not donating a huge percentage of your stack when we miss.
1/3: TPTK+NFD facing flop bet from non-aggressor Quote
11-14-2014 , 07:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongTimeNoSee
you want to raise the set for that reason?
I think it's unreasonable to put him only on sets. He could have two pairs, pair+SD type hands here too, and given my NITTY IMAGE, he will lay them down to a raise 100%.
1/3: TPTK+NFD facing flop bet from non-aggressor Quote
11-14-2014 , 07:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by surviva316
That's the nice thing about having the stone-cold, immortal mother-flippin' nuts. We can afford to build the pot once our hand is made because there is no amount of betting that will reduce the chances of us winning the pot. We even have the 7s for good measure to block the SF and paired board.

Of course it makes it *harder* for us to win as big of a pot, but the solution of building the pot before our hand is made kind of contradicts your other goal of not donating a huge percentage of your stack when we miss.
Yeah, but I think we're discounting the massive FE my image generates when I raise.
1/3: TPTK+NFD facing flop bet from non-aggressor Quote
11-14-2014 , 10:17 AM
Because the nut flush draw you should get as more ppl in the pot as possible. Raise here only bluffs away other FDs and force youself to play a nit heads up.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using 2+2 Forums
1/3: TPTK+NFD facing flop bet from non-aggressor Quote
11-14-2014 , 10:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fizzypants
Yeah, but I think we're discounting the massive FE my image generates when I raise.
I don't think described player leads out with pair+SD. MAYBE 88, but I think it's much more likely to be a hand that he feels in a rush to protect, so two-pair is likely the bottom of his range. A nitty image might give him a tough decision on the flop with the bottom of that range, but for the most part, he's either going to sigh-[continue] or happily shove thinking he's securing a cooler.

If the dealer can turn you a four straight, then you gain some FE against two pairs and sets.
1/3: TPTK+NFD facing flop bet from non-aggressor Quote
11-14-2014 , 10:44 AM
If he will fold, just call and try to bring V2 and BB along. If one of them raises, just raise then. I still think it's going to be tough to get paid off.

Edit: My default is to raise here.
1/3: TPTK+NFD facing flop bet from non-aggressor Quote

      
m