Quote:
Originally Posted by gobbledygeek
Might want to read the stickies, this reverse HH stuff ain't smiled upon here.
Here's one thing I would take to heart here: unless your opponent is super bad, purely setmining HU OOP to the preflop aggressor is highly unlikely to be profitable. So I would have folded preflop.
You're facing a Button raise when it's folded to him, which means he likely has a very wide range, which means it's likely he won't have anything worth paying off with even when we hit our set. And if we don't hit our set, what exactly are we going to do postflop? Yeah, he probably doesn't have anything on the KT7 flop when he cbets, but are we really going to continue OOP? And even here, look how ******ed and unlucky we needed the Villain to be in this case before we actually made money. Preflop we called $12 extra, which means we need to make up about $90 postflop just to breakeven; we didn't get to the $90 mark until Villain stupidly raised the turn and called the reraise (most non horrendous players wouldn't have done either). In fact, if he simply called the turn donk and a PSB on the river, we would have still come up way short of breaking even. Basically, we got very lucky here that all the stars aligned, in that he had hand, hit his hand, his hand "improved", and he also played it horribly.
Gyou'rebleedingmoneyanddon'tevenrealizeitG
Sorry of I have mis-read this post but are you advocating folding 66 out of the bb vs a button raise?
Let's perhaps not use the way this hand has gone as an example because both hero and villan which ever way you look at it have butchered this hand, but 66 out of the bb is a slam dunk defend,