*Vomits*
In all honesty, I feel like this is one of those spots where prior tendencies of villain will completely make our decision otr.
If there was no tank on the turn, I think this is a pretty easy jam trying to target small flushes that can’t fold here, as villains range will contain many. But, I assume most players at 1/3 wouldn’t view this turn card as an agonizing spot with a small flush. Perhaps on the river, but not turn.
With the info on the turn, I think villain will have hands like KT, QJ, KJ/KQ with a spade, and potentially some oddly played sets a lot more often than a flush. It doesn’t mean he never has one, it just seems like he’d be more weighted to these hands which could definitely be perceived as tough spots on the turn.
With that being said, this is arguably the worst river in the deck, as most of that range is either boated up or beating nothing. So, if we know villain has a tendency to find folds in spots by properly reading hands and assessing situations, I could definitely find a check back here, as any perceptive villain will realize that we’re extremely polarized with a jam and will find folds with almost all the hands we beat. But, if we’ve seen villain as a payoff wizard in the past, or we don’t believe him to be fully competent in hand reading, we could probably jam and expect to get called and be good against 50+% of his range.
Unfortunately, it seems a bit more likely that villain is a part of the former category, and might be able to make the correct lay down against us. If that’s true, I would probably make what could easily be the weakest check back ever made.