You made a few critical mistakes, imo.
Your first mistake, I think, was being at the table at all with 300bbs. With so much in the pot, you might've re-raised over the 140 as Eld suggests, but possibly with so much on the table, at risk, you didn't pull the trigger. Fear of commitment can affect your decisions. Would you have folded if you only had 300-450 on the table? Still a tough decision, but allot easier than 700 (effective). Or mabe even tougher because commitment isn't a worry, and it goes down to math.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT007
Limp .. Generally while I will raise 2/3 of all hands played , when IP I will limp ATC with rec players and watch to see what happens - I think more mistakes are made post flop than pre.
This is a huge leak imo. Try keeping a running tally over the session how many times you VP$IP, "saw a flop" with 4+ others, missed, and check-folded. Bet you probably cost yourself 1/4-1/2 a BI each sesh. This just bleeds your stack.
Then there are spots like this, where you flop a monster that could also be crushed, or counterfeited, but you can't get away from it because your crushing everyone's limping range.
I won't even get into my general view of limping in an average, generally passive LLSNL table (*cough* weak-sause *cough* *cough* loose/passive *cough* *Hatoo!*), but with ATC for marginal reasons ("ooo, they're soooted!"), you'll keep finding yourself in RIO land.
You might want to find better descriptors for Villains. "Rec fish" doesn't say much. He could be a nit, a loose/passive station, maniac spewtard...All these playing types fall under this description, but require different reactions when they're making or calling or raising a flop 3-bet. Rumchess's Guide thread is a great place to start with this.