Quote:
Originally Posted by venice10
OP, did you make a thread to justify your action, prove you are smarter than everyone else, or were actually looking for guidance?
People are telling you it was spew. Mainly because it is spew. Either post the results to prove your point, or stop arguing with everyone that they are wrong.
I just can't respect people who say that my play is complete spew. Perhaps my play was suboptimal, and you are welcome to tell me that my play is suboptimal, but I really doubt it was complete spew.
If you give me some respect and say "I see what you're trying to do here but I disagree with this action, for these reasons", then I can respect that advice, but when you treat me like a spewtard when I'm actually a winning player at $1/$3, then to me, it looks like you're the ignorant player that simply doesn't understand my play.
You know who else thinks I'm a spewtard? All the OMC's at the casino. In their eyes, anyone who bluffs, bluff catches or thin value bets is a spewy young kid. They could watch the $25/$50 online players and the OMC's would have the audacity to criticise and laugh at the online regs, simply because they're so stuck in their ways that they fail to comprehend a style of play that is new to them.
To me, it feels like 90% of the 2p2 players are stuck in 2007 mode. All the advice they give is 2007 stuff like "lol you can beat 25nl without bluffing, just value bet and you'll crush them for 40bb/100". They don't understand concepts like betting 30% pot on dry flops. And rather than simply asking "why did you bet so small here?" they just straight up say "you played so spewy" like the response I'd expect from an 80 year old man.
I'll post results later but honestly, results don't even matter that much because I'm not results-oriented. I like to look at villain's entire range, rather than looking at the hand that the villain happened to show up with on this specific occasion.