Quote:
Originally Posted by momo_uk
It just feels too wrong to blast my raise size in these spots based on eff stacks because I wouldn't be comfortable going $30 (10%) with a hand like A7s here. Or $50 if I was $500 effective. It's just not my style, especially when it's the first hand I'm raising in 20-30 mins due to being card dead.
Not to forget it's going to get folds a huge majority of the time and I'm missing so much value with JJ.
Forget about balance unless you think people are figuring you out (and that will take them a *long* time to do). If you're sitting on a $300 stack and think you can get it HU with a raise with A7s from the CO, then raise to $10 or $12 (or just open limp it, which would actually be my preference); if you've been dealt AA, then raise to $30. I just recounted this story in the chat thread, but the last time I had AA on the Button vs 2 limpers and raised to $30 in my 1/3 NL game (I hadn't played a hand, let alone raised one, in about a month and a half) the first limper shoved $260 and the second limper insta called. I mean, lol, it's live pokers. Raise big with your big hands and raise small with your small ones (or not at all) and simply print monies in these spots.
Yes, you're probably not going to be able to raise to $50 at most 1/3 NL tables with a $500 stack, I understand that (although, lol, at some tables I could probably get away with that). But a $23 raise targetting the SB stack (especially if BB and us are in same neighbourhood)? I know I play at a super loose table, but $23 isn't getting folds 100% of the time where I play.
ETA: Also, even if everyone folds at least you won the blinds/limps with your JJ. Look at what happened here: you put in a bunch of money and still didn't drag the pot *and* you had the best hand; where's your "value" now?
GgoodluckG