these are spots where we have to remember we are playing a range of cards rather than exact cards, if we have a tight image or if people are calling too much we can c-bet more often, if we have been loose while our opponents are tight we can c-bet less often

overall tho, the frequency we bet the flop should be around 55-60% since that should be an optimum c-bet frequency for all of our hands. This means we should check Aces or Kings or any overpairs some of the time but less frequently. It's definitely not wrong to c-bet all of these flops but not all of the time

double barrell frequency should be around half of the flop bet frequency and triple barrell frequency doesn't matter. when we get to the river all that matters is villains fold % so we can just give up vs some people and keep going vs others depending on stacks obv but there is math that we can use on the river independently of what happened previous

Sorry I don’t have PIO either. I just know these things from my weekly coaching lessons.

H1 is a x/f imo, cbet isnt terrible but H2 cbet is definitely a x/f and torching vs 2 plyers on this board

H3 very good candidate to xc board is bad for us and IP will stab a lot with weak hands he otherwise would have folded to vs bet, we can continue on a lot of turns as well.

Your preflop ranges, the very first street of poker and the simplest, are terrible if you’re iso’ing KTo in the HJ, ‘nuff said lol

I finally agree with you

Im gonna go out on a limb and assume that you havent really taken a look at Equilab/Flopzilla/PIO/Pokerstove much at all, and any form of range analysis/constructions.

Yes, betting may be +EV in H3 but checking is probably better and yields more EV and induces more mistakes/flop stabs w/ low equity. H1 i exaggerated, a cbet isnt terrible but i’d still check. Just because we check doesnt mean that we x/f every single time. That’s a very strange assumption people tend to make when playing OOP. It’s like when they get dbl barreled on a montone board with a set and just rip OTT 300bb deep bc they don’t know what to do on rivers (hand posted today). IP will check or give up a lot bc they’re passive. So on 30-70% of rivers we just check and IP checks back. We can delay cbet some turns, or we can check it down and win with K high. Checking H1 is literally not the end of the world. IP technically is supposed to stab this with 70-90% freq but in practice live players are going to very very underbluff vs a missed cbet. Thus we overrealize our equity and can even bluff future streets very profitably, since IP should rarely ever check a weak overpair or 6x here. They’ll just bet all their pairs, flush draws, and check their garbage / A-high that they’ll probably fold on later streets

H2 KTo no diamond cbet is definitely bad and there’s literally no good reason to cbet vs two players on this board. If you’re defending a flop cbet on this board vs two players without a diamond I really don’t know what to tell you other than to seriously consider taking even a peak at range analysis/constructions

Yes you win a lot of money playing your unorthodox style but if you ever looked beyond it, you’d be a lot better and win even more money. I’d bet on that. And also because you have basically zero knowledge of theory, you’ll get a lot in return if you ever looked at it for even a little bit (diminishing marginal returns idea). Don’t think you would anytime soon but your loss

funny i think i can solve this in my head

flop 1 would be around 65-70% c-bet with lower double barrell frequency, 15%

flop 2 would be 55%-60% with around 25-30 dbl barrel (there is a logical reason why this should be a 2barrell more often than not) -- in fact this is our most logical candidate for a 3 barrell, one of the reasons being it has the least showdown value and barreling is the best way to win the pot, we also have the most uncapped range here

flop 3 would be 25% cbet with almost no betting at all when called, like 0% bet turn

don't ask how i come up with this but i wager a good solver would say the same thing

Lol is this a troll post?