Quote:
Originally Posted by MogFish
Nope. I said open jam if you don’t want to play poker. I’m not saying “AK is a drawing hand” but it’s pretty naive to think AKo is easy to play multi-way with low SPR without making a pair. How easy would our decision be if we held JJ+ in this spot? AP, our hands are tied and this situation could have been mitigated by using a normal size pre.
So if you were playing HU and the dude was calling $50 raises with 50-100% of all starting hands, you'd rather raise to to a "standard" amount like $12 with AK? That's absolutely ridiculous. You're leaving benjamin franklins on the table if you'd do that.
If we had JJ, the probability of the flop coming out with an A/K/Q is approximately more or less the same probability of the board not pairing our A/K when we raise $50 pre. So your argument of using JJ makes no sense. We just happen to have AK on an unpaired board. If OP had JJ and raised $50 pre and the flop came an ace, you would also say to use a smaller raise size, and that our hands are tied because of our lol raise size. It's not about the hand. It's about expected value, i.e. our value in the long run. And of course having the stone cold nuts or 2nd nuts preflop is better than AK. Jee, thanks for pointing that out, sherlock.
Lots of extreme hindsight bias/confirmation bias in your post. Might be useful for your game to look up what those are. You most definitely wouldn't have said the situation could have been mitigated by using a normal size pre if we flopped a K or A, and gii vs weak Ax. You would have said something along the lines of or agreed with: "WP. These donkeys were willing to call ragged Ax vs your $50 raise and got it in with the worst hand."