I'm not a fan of building bloated pots deep and multiway and OOP, although I guess this hand can mostly handle that. If we're going to go multiway (which we always are) then a smaller raise to give us a lot more room to move might actually be better (and I tend to lean to the smallest raise possible here, which is a limp, but that's me).
No draw, no pair, no card to rep, OOP, 4ways, against at least one "typical bad reg" (which I mostly read as "pays off far more than they should when obviously beat". And we cbet. Pay me $10 now or I'm telling DLuo about this one.
I think we're setting money on fire, but that's me. I check/fold.
While the Jd turn is an overcard, it's simply not scary enough for me to rep, so I'd probably just check/evaluate. If betting, I'm probably betting less just to give myself better odds (especially if raised); is he really folding *that* much more for $110 than he is for $65 (which looks milky as hell)?
I probably check/fold the river. There are some draws that he missed, so we do have showdown value. Is he capable of bluffing given the strength we've shown up to now (where it really looks were bluffcatching the river)?
I've said this a zillion times in your thread, so I'm just repeating myself (again), but taking high variance lines on a limited roll in a game where ABC low variance lines will work just fine is dumbfounding.
GcluelessNLnoobG