title meant to be 1600£

£1/3 game, Hero has been playing with villain for a few hours and has been playing Tight and aggressive, showing down the goods a lot of the time. Definatly think vilain respects heros game. Hero has 2.1£k and villain ~800£.

Shortstack in this hand is irrelevant, he has been losing bullet after bullet and reloading, he has 100£.

Vilain has been playing very aggressively, and I have seen him bluff at least 3 times during the night. When the pot is big he can't help it and will fire on the river if needed. So far its been working so so for him with some going through and some not.

On to the hand.. straddle is on

Preflop (£10): Utg limp, MP limps, and I decide to limp Q9 on the btn instead of raising as I had been raising alot and decided to mix it up a bit. SB ss calls, and villain in BB raises 36£. UTG, MP, Hero and SB calls.

Flop (£186): 865
sb checks, Villain bets £125, folds to hero, Hero calls, SB shoves £75 that he has left.

Turn (£450): 9
Villain bets £250, Hero calls

River (£950): 8
Villain bets all in £350.

Thoughts on all streets? mostly postflop

preflop this is a fold. Q9s just gets us in too many akward spots like this one.

Flop I would raise to 300 with the idea of getting heads up vs the small stack all in.

As played I fold this river.

This spot just isnt good to bluff. He has to show anyway because of the small stack all in. Knowing that the small stack is likely to get it in on the flop, means his range is leaning towards stronger and also taking into account the amount of opponents he is playing against oop, I am leaning towards strong hands. As I am writing this I realize, that it is contradicting the raise on the flop, but it all comes down to him being able to fold an OP on the flop or not.
Betting into the turn 9, screams strength, or at least unwillingness to fold. If he is folding his hand, it is on the flop.