const userId = 0; 1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? - Live Low-stakes No Limit Poker Forum - Live Poker Low-stakes NL
Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? 1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive?

12-12-2013 , 10:34 AM
9-handed 1/2 game. villian seems a quiet and tight passive old guy based on my reads during a few orbits of observation. One limper,hero raises to $15 in mp with KQ,villian in sb calls,limper folds. Hero has $350 but villian got me covered.
Flop($32): A K J
Villian checks,hero checks behind
Turn($32): K villian bets $20,hero raises to $75,villian calls
River($182): 6 villian checks,hero?

Last edited by maplestar; 12-12-2013 at 10:58 AM.
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 10:41 AM
B/F $80-$90, hoping to get value from AQ/AJ.
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 10:47 AM
Easy bet/fold. I like $800-$100.
He can call with lots of worse Kings, weak and strong Aces.

He should be slow playing a set almost never.
Same with straights.

Who knows what crap he will call with, but his range has about 0 hands that are better than yours.
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 12:01 PM
b/f around $100

I don't like checking this behind.
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by samo
B/F $80-$90, hoping to get value from AQ/AJ.
Tight passive dudes aren't really calling the turn raise with AQ/AJ.

IMO this guy has a straight as often as he has KT.
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 02:42 PM
That raise size is overplaying your hand against an OMC. Hell I'm not so sure OMC leads an ace on the turn, much less pays off your raise with it.
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 03:01 PM
This isn't think value... There are plenty of worse hands a can call with,any K (not KQ AK) and he may call with any A.

I would bet near pot and probably call a raise given sack sizes
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 03:02 PM
Thin value? Are you serious?
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 03:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daniel9861
That raise size is overplaying your hand against an OMC. Hell I'm not so sure OMC leads an ace on the turn, much less pays off your raise with it.
Yup,i figure that i might overplay my hand on this board vs this type of players,so we check behind,right?ppl always put me on ak,lol.
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 03:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbra Streisand
Thin value? Are you serious?
x2. what?
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 08:04 PM
I'm having a hard time constructing a range for this guy that you're a head of that would call a bet on the river. There are no worse kings unless you think he calls 15 bucks pre flop with king 10. A passive old dude is never bet calling the turn with just an ace when the board pairs the kings and there is a possible straight out there. Unless he can't read hands or is a complete mouth breather (which is unlikely based on your description and his stack size) I'm not betting this river.
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 08:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbra Streisand
Thin value? Are you serious?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wj94
x2. what?
I can't tell if you guys are saying it's:

Not even close to thin, this is a super standard easy value bet.

Or this isn't close to thin, it's never a bet, we are always beat.

Damned internet.

Spoiler:
I don't see how this isn't a bet, I would bet here 100% of the time expecting to get called by AX and worse Kings, but what do I know.
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 08:20 PM
Obvious standard value bet. Ax is always calling one more.
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 08:47 PM
Not thin, I enjoy betting $100+
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 09:10 PM
Ha ha,You guys are too optimistic about his calling range.I bet $100 on the river but he tanked and muttered "you have ak,right" and called reluctantly with JJ.I think its a marginal river bet vs such tight timid passive on these Broadway board.You need a better range to get fat fat value from these timid souls.
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 09:16 PM
The guy has to be a station to pay us off with worse in the spot. And OMCs are like the complete opposite of a station. The worst hand we're getting value from here is KT.
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 09:24 PM
Why are you raising turn?
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 09:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jambre
Why are you raising turn?
Yup,i overplayed my hand in the heat of moment and didnt think about tight passive style.
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote
12-12-2013 , 09:34 PM
In general we make money against OMC's with c-bets and sometimes double barrels depending on what hands they fold.
1/2nl, thin value on the river vs tight passive? Quote

      
m