There is merit to this play, but learn where his leaks are first. With weak reads like this I just fold flop and move on.
As for your issues:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdammon
I have a couple issues with bluffing:
1) I'm not sure large bluffs are ever going to be hugely profitable in 1/2 games since players tend to be so sticky.
2) Since a lot of players aren't thinking deeply about the game I worry I can be called with top pair, which is exactly the type of hand I'm targeting.
3)If I am going to bluff, do I need to look for the best hands to bluff in each scenario, or should I be looking for the best scenarios to bluff any hand?
1. There are players at 1/2 who play very predictably and can be bluffed like this, as they tend to play their hands face up. The bluffs won't be hugely profitable because there aren't many players this will work against, and it takes a lot of history to learn who you can pull this off against. While I'm pretty sure I could still win at LLSNL by not running larger multi-street bluffs like this, I have definitely padded my winrate by making some well calculated bluffs. I've also tanked it by making some less well calculated bluffs too.
2. Again, yes. LLSNL is full of calling stations. It's generally best to assume a player has the traditional leaks (calls too much, doesn't bluff much, plays hands face up) until proven otherwise.
3. I would say it's 90% scenario, 10% hands at these stakes. I target my bluffs against people who I know can be bluffed, in a spot where their range is weak and face up, and I can credibly rep a hand that beats them. Having good blockers to their value hands can tip the scales in a close spot, but is otherwise not super critical. It's more important when you are trying to construct a GTO bluff/value range, which is usually not necessary at LLSNL. In fact, it can be counterproductive.