1/2
Villain is a new player at the table, I have seen him in the poker room a few different times but have never played against him. Early twenties young white guy, talkative and seems to know a lot of players in the room. But, he always seems to have less than a starting stack.
Villain (~200) UTG opens to 10$
Folds to Hero (covers) who has QQ in the HJ
Hero 3-bets to 35$
Villain flats
Flop (73) K
4
2
Villain checks..
I put him on TT, JJ, AK, AQ type hands and maybe a few speculative hands although unlikely..
Obviously we aren't trying to get 3-streets, maybe not even 2? (thoughts?) I think I still prefer betting the first street though so we can still rep AK, AA, and define our opponents range more clearly. My plan being to bet flop, check back turn and decide what to do on rivers. I didn't want to check back flop and possibly give this opponent the opportunity to barrel turn and river and put us in a tough spot. I would balance that line with the AK, AA as well, or at least some of it. Does anyone see any major flaws in this way of thinking about the hand?
Hero bets 45$
Villain calls
Turn (163) K
K
4
2
Check Check
River (163) T
K
K
4
2
Villain tanks and fiddles around with 35$ in chips before adding them to the top of his stack and going all in.
I believe it was about a 135$ shove.
Hero?